|

NewEconomy
Index.org Home
2002
State Index Home
Introduction
Overview &
Methodology
Overall Rankings
Summary of Results
THE INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Information
Technology Jobs

Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education

Education
Level of the Manufacturing Workforce
PART
II: GLOBALIZATION
Export
Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign
Direct Investment
PART
III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
"Gazelle"
Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
PART
IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
Online Population

Commercial
Internet Domain Names

Technology
in Schools

Digital
Government

Online Agriculture

Online Manufacturers

Broadband
Telecommunications
PART
V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
High-Tech
Jobs

Scientists
and Engineers

Patents

Industry
Investment in R&D

Venture
Capital
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Data Sources
Weighting Methodology
Endnotes
The Author



|
 |
High-Tech
Jobs
Jobs in electronics
manufacturing, software and computer-related services, telecommunications,
and biomedical as a share of total employment.
34
"IT investment in 2001 was higher than any year prior to 2000."
WHY
IS THIS IMPORTANT? Notwithstanding the difficulties
in the IT sector, technology companies remain key engines of the New Economy.
High-tech output increased from 5.5 percent of GDP in 1990 to 6.2 percent
in 1996 to 8.3 percent in 2000, while average wages in the sector are
73 percent higher than in the rest of the economy.
35 The slowdown in the IT and telecommunications
sec-tor is cyclical, in part a natural adjustment to the extremely high
level of IT investment in 1999 and 2000 to respond to the Y2K crisis and
the dot-com and telecom bubbles. Even so, IT investment in 2001 was higher
than any year prior to 2000. And it's expected to grow as IT gets cheaper
and more powerful, and a host of new technologies, including smart cards,
voice recognition, expert systems, cheap storage devices, new display
devices, intelligent transportation systems, "third generation" wireless
communication devices, and robots are rolled out. And with the breakthroughs
in the human genome project, biotechnology and related biomedical industries
are poised for robust growth.
THE
RANKINGS: The high-tech focus of states varies significantly,
from a high of 10.4 percent of the workforce in Massachusetts to 1.4 percent
in Wyoming. While all states have high-tech jobs, the leaders tend to
be in the Northeast, the Mountain states, and the Pacific region. High-tech
jobs are often concentrated in particular regions of a state: information
technology in southern New Hampshire, software around Provo, Utah and
Seattle; Internet and telecommunications in the Washington, DC region;
telecommunications in Denver; semiconductors in Phoenix; and a broad mix
of technologies in Silicon Valley and Los Angeles.
| STATES
BY RANK |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 1 |
Massachusetts |
10.4% |
| 2 |
Colorado |
10.0% |
| 3 |
New
Hampshire |
9.6% |
| 4 |
California |
8.9% |
| 5 |
Virginia |
7.5% |
| 6 |
New
Jersey |
7.1% |
| 7 |
Minnesota |
6.9% |
| 8 |
Maryland |
6.6% |
| 9 |
Washington |
6.6% |
| 10 |
Connecticut |
6.6% |
| 11 |
Utah |
6.4% |
| 12 |
Oregon |
6.3% |
| 13 |
Vermont |
6.3% |
| 14 |
Idaho |
5.9% |
| 15 |
New
Mexico |
5.8% |
| 16 |
Arizona |
5.8% |
| 17 |
Texas |
5.7% |
| 18 |
New
York |
5.3% |
| 19 |
Nebraska |
4.9% |
| 20 |
Georgia |
4.8% |
| 21 |
Illinois |
4.8% |
| 22 |
South
Dakota |
4.7% |
| 23 |
Pennsylvania |
4.6% |
| 24 |
North
Carolina |
4.5% |
| 25 |
Rhode
Island |
4.4% |
| 26 |
Florida |
4.3% |
| 27 |
Kansas |
3.9% |
| 28 |
Iowa |
3.9% |
| 29 |
Missouri |
3.8% |
| 30 |
Ohio |
3.5% |
| 31 |
Wisconsin |
3.5% |
| 32 |
Delaware |
3.4% |
| 33 |
Indiana |
3.4% |
| 34 |
Maine |
3.3% |
| 35 |
Alabama |
3.3% |
| 36 |
Michigan |
3.2% |
| 37 |
Oklahoma |
2.9% |
| 38 |
Nevada |
2.7% |
| 39 |
Tennessee |
2.6% |
| 40 |
North
Dakota |
2.6% |
| 41 |
South
Carolina |
2.5% |
| 42 |
Kentucky |
2.5% |
| 43 |
Arkansas |
2.4% |
| 44 |
Alaska |
2.1% |
| 45 |
West
Virginia |
2.1% |
| 46 |
Hawaii |
2.0% |
| 47 |
Mississippi |
1.9% |
| 48 |
Montana |
1.8% |
| 49 |
Louisiana |
1.6% |
| 50 |
Wyoming |
1.4% |
|
U.S.
Average |
5.3% |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 35 |
Alabama |
3.3% |
| 44 |
Alaska |
2.1% |
| 16 |
Arizona |
5.8% |
| 43 |
Arkansas |
2.4% |
| 4 |
California |
8.9% |
| 2 |
Colorado |
10.0% |
| 10 |
Connecticut |
6.6% |
| 32 |
Delaware |
3.4% |
| 26 |
Florida |
4.3% |
| 20 |
Georgia |
4.8% |
| 46 |
Hawaii |
2.0% |
| 14 |
Idaho |
5.9% |
| 21 |
Illinois |
4.8% |
| 33 |
Indiana |
3.4% |
| 28 |
Iowa |
3.9% |
| 27 |
Kansas |
3.9% |
| 42 |
Kentucky |
2.5% |
| 49 |
Louisiana |
1.6% |
| 34 |
Maine |
3.3% |
| 8 |
Maryland |
6.6% |
| 1 |
Massachusetts |
10.4% |
| 36 |
Michigan |
3.2% |
| 7 |
Minnesota |
6.9% |
| 47 |
Mississippi |
1.9% |
| 29 |
Missouri |
3.8% |
| 48 |
Montana |
1.8% |
| 19 |
Nebraska |
4.9% |
| 38 |
Nevada |
2.7% |
| 3 |
New
Hampshire |
9.6% |
| 6 |
New
Jersey |
7.1% |
| 15 |
New
Mexico |
5.8% |
| 18 |
New
York |
5.3% |
| 24 |
North
Carolina |
4.5% |
| 40 |
North
Dakota |
2.6% |
| 30 |
Ohio |
3.5% |
| 37 |
Oklahoma |
2.9% |
| 12 |
Oregon |
6.3% |
| 23 |
Pennsylvania |
4.6% |
| 25 |
Rhode
Island |
4.4% |
| 41 |
South
Carolina |
2.5% |
| 22 |
South
Dakota |
4.7% |
| 39 |
Tennessee |
2.6% |
| 17 |
Texas |
5.7% |
| 11 |
Utah |
6.4% |
| 13 |
Vermont |
6.3% |
| 5 |
Virginia |
7.5% |
| 9 |
Washington |
6.6% |
| 45 |
West
Virginia |
2.1% |
| 31 |
Wisconsin |
3.5% |
| 50 |
Wyoming |
1.4% |
|
Source: American Electronics
Association, 2000 data, and U.S. Census (for biomedical sections), 1999
data.
Go
to next indicator >>
2002 State Index Home | Introduction
| Overview &
Methodology | The Rankings
| Summary of Results
Development Strategies |
Data Sources
Weighting Methodology | Endnotes
| The Author
The Progressive
Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|