PPI Technology Project
 
NewEconomy
Index.org Home

 
2002 State Index Home
 
Introduction
 
Overview & Methodology
 
Overall Rankings
 
Summary of Results
 
THE INDICATORS
 
PART I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
 
Information Technology Jobs

Managerial, Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce Education

Education Level of the Manufacturing Workforce
 
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
 
Export Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign Direct Investment
 
PART III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
 
"Gazelle" Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
 
PART IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
 
Online Population

Commercial Internet Domain Names

Technology in Schools

Digital Government

Online Agriculture

Online Manufacturers

Broadband Telecommunications
 
PART V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
 
High-Tech Jobs

Scientists and Engineers

Patents

Industry Investment in R&D

Venture Capital
 
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
 
Data Sources
 
Weighting Methodology
 
Endnotes
 
The Author

The New Economy Index
The Metro New Economy Index
The 1999 New Economy Index

BROWSE BY STATE:
The State New Economy Index
PART 5: INNOVATION CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs
Jobs in electronics manufacturing, software and computer-related services, telecommunications, and biomedical as a share of total employment. 34

"IT investment in 2001 was higher than any year prior to 2000."

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? Notwithstanding the difficulties in the IT sector, technology companies remain key engines of the New Economy. High-tech output increased from 5.5 percent of GDP in 1990 to 6.2 percent in 1996 to 8.3 percent in 2000, while average wages in the sector are 73 percent higher than in the rest of the economy. 35 The slowdown in the IT and telecommunications sec-tor is cyclical, in part a natural adjustment to the extremely high level of IT investment in 1999 and 2000 to respond to the Y2K crisis and the dot-com and telecom bubbles. Even so, IT investment in 2001 was higher than any year prior to 2000. And it's expected to grow as IT gets cheaper and more powerful, and a host of new technologies, including smart cards, voice recognition, expert systems, cheap storage devices, new display devices, intelligent transportation systems, "third generation" wireless communication devices, and robots are rolled out. And with the breakthroughs in the human genome project, biotechnology and related biomedical industries are poised for robust growth.

THE RANKINGS: The high-tech focus of states varies significantly, from a high of 10.4 percent of the workforce in Massachusetts to 1.4 percent in Wyoming. While all states have high-tech jobs, the leaders tend to be in the Northeast, the Mountain states, and the Pacific region. High-tech jobs are often concentrated in particular regions of a state: information technology in southern New Hampshire, software around Provo, Utah and Seattle; Internet and telecommunications in the Washington, DC region; telecommunications in Denver; semiconductors in Phoenix; and a broad mix of technologies in Silicon Valley and Los Angeles.

 
STATES BY RANK
Rank State Score
1 Massachusetts 10.4%
2 Colorado 10.0%
3 New Hampshire 9.6%
4 California 8.9%
5 Virginia 7.5%
6 New Jersey 7.1%
7 Minnesota 6.9%
8 Maryland 6.6%
9 Washington 6.6%
10 Connecticut 6.6%
11 Utah 6.4%
12 Oregon 6.3%
13 Vermont 6.3%
14 Idaho 5.9%
15 New Mexico 5.8%
16 Arizona 5.8%
17 Texas 5.7%
18 New York 5.3%
19 Nebraska 4.9%
20 Georgia 4.8%
21 Illinois 4.8%
22 South Dakota 4.7%
23 Pennsylvania 4.6%
24 North Carolina 4.5%
25 Rhode Island 4.4%
26 Florida 4.3%
27 Kansas 3.9%
28 Iowa 3.9%
29 Missouri 3.8%
30 Ohio 3.5%
31 Wisconsin 3.5%
32 Delaware 3.4%
33 Indiana 3.4%
34 Maine 3.3%
35 Alabama 3.3%
36 Michigan 3.2%
37 Oklahoma 2.9%
38 Nevada 2.7%
39 Tennessee 2.6%
40 North Dakota 2.6%
41 South Carolina 2.5%
42 Kentucky 2.5%
43 Arkansas 2.4%
44 Alaska 2.1%
45 West Virginia 2.1%
46 Hawaii 2.0%
47 Mississippi 1.9%
48 Montana 1.8%
49 Louisiana 1.6%
50 Wyoming 1.4%
U.S. Average 5.3%
    
ALPHABETICALLY
Rank State Score
35 Alabama 3.3%
44 Alaska 2.1%
16 Arizona 5.8%
43 Arkansas 2.4%
4 California 8.9%
2 Colorado 10.0%
10 Connecticut 6.6%
32 Delaware 3.4%
26 Florida 4.3%
20 Georgia 4.8%
46 Hawaii 2.0%
14 Idaho 5.9%
21 Illinois 4.8%
33 Indiana 3.4%
28 Iowa 3.9%
27 Kansas 3.9%
42 Kentucky 2.5%
49 Louisiana 1.6%
34 Maine 3.3%
8 Maryland 6.6%
1 Massachusetts 10.4%
36 Michigan 3.2%
7 Minnesota 6.9%
47 Mississippi 1.9%
29 Missouri 3.8%
48 Montana 1.8%
19 Nebraska 4.9%
38 Nevada 2.7%
3 New Hampshire 9.6%
6 New Jersey 7.1%
15 New Mexico 5.8%
18 New York 5.3%
24 North Carolina 4.5%
40 North Dakota 2.6%
30 Ohio 3.5%
37 Oklahoma 2.9%
12 Oregon 6.3%
23 Pennsylvania 4.6%
25 Rhode Island 4.4%
41 South Carolina 2.5%
22 South Dakota 4.7%
39 Tennessee 2.6%
17 Texas 5.7%
11 Utah 6.4%
13 Vermont 6.3%
5 Virginia 7.5%
9 Washington 6.6%
45 West Virginia 2.1%
31 Wisconsin 3.5%
50 Wyoming 1.4%

Source: American Electronics Association, 2000 data, and U.S. Census (for biomedical sections), 1999 data.

Printer-friendly page (Adobe PDF)


Go to next indicator >>



 
2002 State Index Home | Introduction | Overview &
Methodology
| The Rankings | Summary of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Weighting Methodology | Endnotes | The Author

pdf Download PDF Version of This Report (10 MB)
Please expect lengthy download time,
during which your browser window may appear blank.
(PDF version requires Acrobat Reader)
 
The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
 
 
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.