|

NewEconomy
Index.org Home
2002
State Index Home
Introduction
Overview &
Methodology
Overall Rankings
Summary of Results
THE INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Information
Technology Jobs

Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education

Education
Level of the Manufacturing Workforce
PART
II: GLOBALIZATION
Export
Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign
Direct Investment
PART
III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
"Gazelle"
Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
PART
IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
Online Population

Commercial
Internet Domain Names

Technology
in Schools

Digital
Government

Online Agriculture

Online Manufacturers

Broadband
Telecommunications
PART
V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
High-Tech
Jobs

Scientists
and Engineers

Patents

Industry
Investment in R&D

Venture
Capital
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Data Sources
Weighting Methodology
Endnotes
The Author



|
 |
Technology
in Schools
A weighted
measure of five factors measuring computer and Internet use in schools.
23
"The percentage of classrooms with Internet access has gone from
27 percent in 1997, to 82 percent in 2000."
WHY
IS THIS IMPORTANT? There is increasing evidence that
when used right, computers and the Internet boost educational out-comes.
24 Not surprisingly, the use of
information technology in America's schools is growing. The percentage
of schools with at least one Internet connection has increased rapidly,
from 78 percent in 1997, to 94 percent in 2000, while the percentage of
classrooms with Internet access has gone from 27 percent in 1997, to 82
percent in 2000.
25
THE
RANKINGS: A number of states that are furthest ahead
in integrating information technology into schools are the less populated
and more geographically dispersed states, suggesting that a motivating
factor is the desire to establish better connections to information and
resources in other parts of the nation and the world. Political leaders
in these and other states may recognize that the IT revolution is an important
key to their future prosperity and that it is essential to properly train
the next generation of workers. Surprisingly, a number of states with
strong technology economies score notably low on this measure, including
Connecticut, Maryland, New Hampshire, and California, which ranks last.
| STATES
BY RANK |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 1 |
Nebraska |
3.82 |
| 2 |
South
Dakota |
3.64 |
| 3 |
Delaware |
3.58 |
| 4 |
Ohio |
3.47 |
| 5 |
Iowa |
3.37 |
| 6 |
Alaska |
3.35 |
| 7 |
Minnesota |
3.21 |
| 8 |
Wyoming |
3.05 |
| 9 |
Missouri |
2.94 |
| 10 |
South
Carolina |
2.94 |
| 11 |
North
Dakota |
2.94 |
| 12 |
West
Virginia |
2.90 |
| 13 |
Idaho |
2.87 |
| 14 |
Virginia |
2.81 |
| 15 |
Maine |
2.79 |
| 16 |
Kansas |
2.74 |
| 17 |
Texas |
2.63 |
| 18 |
Kentucky |
2.59 |
| 19 |
Wisconsin |
2.59 |
| 20 |
Utah |
2.47 |
| 21 |
Colorado |
2.31 |
| 22 |
Indiana |
2.07 |
| 23 |
Illinois |
2.06 |
| 24 |
New
Jersey |
2.01 |
| 25 |
Oregon |
2.00 |
| 26 |
Hawaii |
1.95 |
| 27 |
Washington |
1.95 |
| 28 |
Vermont |
1.84 |
| 29 |
Oklahoma |
1.81 |
| 30 |
Arkansas |
1.66 |
| 31 |
Montana |
1.65 |
| 32 |
Arizona |
1.65 |
| 33 |
Georgia |
1.60 |
| 34 |
Pennsylvania |
1.42 |
| 35 |
Rhode
Island |
1.39 |
| 36 |
Michigan |
1.35 |
| 37 |
Tennessee |
1.33 |
| 38 |
New
Mexico |
1.32 |
| 39 |
Florida |
1.16 |
| 40 |
Massachusetts |
1.06 |
| 41 |
Mississippi |
1.05 |
| 42 |
Maryland |
0.87 |
| 43 |
New
York |
0.86 |
| 44 |
North
Carolina |
0.84 |
| 45 |
New
Hampshire |
0.49 |
| 46 |
Alabama |
0.42 |
| 47 |
Connecticut |
0.42 |
| 48 |
Louisiana |
0.39 |
| 49 |
Nevada |
0.35 |
| 50 |
California |
0.02 |
|
U.S.
Average |
2.00 |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 46 |
Alabama |
0.42 |
| 6 |
Alaska |
3.35 |
| 32 |
Arizona |
1.65 |
| 30 |
Arkansas |
1.66 |
| 50 |
California |
0.02 |
| 21 |
Colorado |
2.31 |
| 47 |
Connecticut |
0.42 |
| 3 |
Delaware |
3.58 |
| 39 |
Florida |
1.16 |
| 33 |
Georgia |
1.60 |
| 26 |
Hawaii |
1.95 |
| 13 |
Idaho |
2.87 |
| 23 |
Illinois |
2.06 |
| 22 |
Indiana |
2.07 |
| 5 |
Iowa |
3.37 |
| 16 |
Kansas |
2.74 |
| 18 |
Kentucky |
2.59 |
| 48 |
Louisiana |
0.39 |
| 15 |
Maine |
2.79 |
| 42 |
Maryland |
0.87 |
| 40 |
Massachusetts |
1.06 |
| 36 |
Michigan |
1.35 |
| 7 |
Minnesota |
3.21 |
| 41 |
Mississippi |
1.05 |
| 9 |
Missouri |
2.94 |
| 31 |
Montana |
1.65 |
| 1 |
Nebraska |
3.82 |
| 49 |
Nevada |
0.35 |
| 45 |
New
Hampshire |
0.49 |
| 24 |
New
Jersey |
2.01 |
| 38 |
New
Mexico |
1.32 |
| 43 |
New
York |
0.86 |
| 44 |
North
Carolina |
0.84 |
| 11 |
North
Dakota |
2.94 |
| 4 |
Ohio |
3.47 |
| 29 |
Oklahoma |
1.81 |
| 25 |
Oregon |
2.00 |
| 34 |
Pennsylvania |
1.42 |
| 35 |
Rhode
Island |
1.39 |
| 10 |
South
Carolina |
2.94 |
| 2 |
South
Dakota |
3.64 |
| 37 |
Tennessee |
1.33 |
| 17 |
Texas |
2.63 |
| 20 |
Utah |
2.47 |
| 28 |
Vermont |
1.84 |
| 14 |
Virginia |
2.81 |
| 27 |
Washington |
1.95 |
| 12 |
West
Virginia |
2.90 |
| 19 |
Wisconsin |
2.59 |
| 8 |
Wyoming |
3.05 |
|
Source: Education
Week, 2000 data.
Go
to next indicator >>
2002 State Index Home | Introduction
| Overview &
Methodology | The Rankings
| Summary of Results
Development Strategies |
Data Sources
Weighting Methodology | Endnotes
| The Author
The Progressive
Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|