|

NewEconomy
Index.org Home
2002
State Index Home
Introduction
Overview &
Methodology
Overall Rankings
Summary of Results
THE INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Information
Technology Jobs

Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education

Education
Level of the Manufacturing Workforce
PART
II: GLOBALIZATION
Export
Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign
Direct Investment
PART
III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
"Gazelle"
Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
PART
IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
Online Population

Commercial
Internet Domain Names

Technology
in Schools

Digital
Government

Online Agriculture

Online Manufacturers

Broadband
Telecommunications
PART
V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
High-Tech
Jobs

Scientists
and Engineers

Patents

Industry
Investment in R&D

Venture
Capital
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Data Sources
Weighting Methodology
Endnotes
The Author



|
 |
Initial
Public Offerings
A weighted
measure of the value and number of initial public stock offerings of companies
as a share of gross state product. 18
"Even with the dramatic decline in IPOs in 2001... IPOs are expected
to rebound at least to the levels of relatively strong years like 1997
and 1998."
WHY
IS THIS IMPORTANT? In the last two decades, financial
markets have embraced entrepreneurial dynamism. One measure of this is
the number of initial public offerings (first rounds of companies' stock
sold when they make their debut in public markets). IPOs rose by 50 percent
between the 1960s and 1990s and reached unprecedented levels in 2000.
But even with the dramatic decline in IPOs in 2001, as the economy grows
in 2002, IPOs are expected to rebound at least to the levels of relatively
strong years like 1997 and 1998.
THE
RANKINGS: The top states for IPOs are also mostly states
with high New Economy scores: Washington, Massachusetts, California, Colorado,
Virginia, and Maryland. But the production of companies with high growth
potential was not limited to what are commonly viewed as the high-tech
leaders: states like Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, and Oklahoma also ranked
high.
| STATES
BY RANK |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 1 |
Washington |
11.78 |
| 2 |
Massachusetts |
10.78 |
| 3 |
California |
9.06 |
| 4 |
Colorado |
7.08 |
| 5 |
Illinois |
6.85 |
| 6 |
Virginia |
6.66 |
| 7 |
Maryland |
6.49 |
| 8 |
Oklahoma |
6.43 |
| 9 |
Connecticut |
6.26 |
| 10 |
Missouri |
6.23 |
| 11 |
Iowa |
6.11 |
| 12 |
Pennsylvania |
6.10 |
| 13 |
Minnesota |
5.94 |
| 14 |
New
Jersey |
5.81 |
| 15 |
Georgia |
5.78 |
| 16 |
Texas |
5.41 |
| 17 |
New
York |
5.28 |
| 18 |
Arizona |
5.21 |
| 19 |
Indiana |
4.93 |
| 20 |
Florida |
4.93 |
| 21 |
Utah |
4.82 |
| 22 |
Maine |
4.74 |
| 23 |
Oregon |
4.61 |
| 24 |
Tennessee |
4.60 |
| 25 |
Louisiana |
4.54 |
| 26 |
North
Carolina |
4.51 |
| 27 |
New
Hampshire |
4.42 |
| 28 |
Nebraska |
4.31 |
| 29 |
Wisconsin |
4.29 |
| 30 |
Nevada |
4.05 |
| 31 |
Kentucky |
3.97 |
| 32 |
Michigan |
3.96 |
| 33 |
Ohio |
3.67 |
| 34 |
Delaware |
3.55 |
| 34 |
Idaho |
3.55 |
| 34 |
Rhode
Island |
3.55 |
| 34 |
New
Mexico |
3.55 |
| 34 |
Vermont |
3.55 |
| 34 |
Kansas |
3.55 |
| 34 |
Alaska |
3.55 |
| 34 |
Hawaii |
3.55 |
| 34 |
Montana |
3.55 |
| 34 |
South
Carolina |
3.55 |
| 34 |
South
Dakota |
3.55 |
| 34 |
North
Dakota |
3.55 |
| 34 |
Wyoming |
3.55 |
| 34 |
Alabama |
3.55 |
| 34 |
Arkansas |
3.55 |
| 34 |
Mississippi |
3.55 |
| 34 |
West
Virginia |
3.55 |
|
U.S.
Average |
5.00% |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 34 |
Alabama |
3.55 |
| 34 |
Alaska |
3.55 |
| 18 |
Arizona |
5.21 |
| 34 |
Arkansas |
3.55 |
| 3 |
California |
9.06 |
| 4 |
Colorado |
7.08 |
| 9 |
Connecticut |
6.26 |
| 34 |
Delaware |
3.55 |
| 20 |
Florida |
4.93 |
| 15 |
Georgia |
5.78 |
| 34 |
Hawaii |
3.55 |
| 34 |
Idaho |
3.55 |
| 5 |
Illinois |
6.85 |
| 19 |
Indiana |
4.93 |
| 11 |
Iowa |
6.11 |
| 34 |
Kansas |
3.55 |
| 31 |
Kentucky |
3.97 |
| 25 |
Louisiana |
4.54 |
| 22 |
Maine |
4.74 |
| 7 |
Maryland |
6.49 |
| 2 |
Massachusetts |
10.78 |
| 32 |
Michigan |
3.96 |
| 13 |
Minnesota |
5.94 |
| 34 |
Mississippi |
3.55 |
| 10 |
Missouri |
6.23 |
| 34 |
Montana |
3.55 |
| 28 |
Nebraska |
4.31 |
| 30 |
Nevada |
4.05 |
| 27 |
New
Hampshire |
4.42 |
| 14 |
New
Jersey |
5.81 |
| 34 |
New
Mexico |
3.55 |
| 17 |
New
York |
5.28 |
| 26 |
North
Carolina |
4.51 |
| 34 |
North
Dakota |
3.55 |
| 33 |
Ohio |
3.67 |
| 8 |
Oklahoma |
6.43 |
| 23 |
Oregon |
4.61 |
| 12 |
Pennsylvania |
6.10 |
| 34 |
Rhode
Island |
3.55 |
| 34 |
South
Carolina |
3.55 |
| 34 |
South
Dakota |
3.55 |
| 24 |
Tennessee |
4.60 |
| 16 |
Texas |
5.41 |
| 21 |
Utah |
4.82 |
| 34 |
Vermont |
3.55 |
| 6 |
Virginia |
6.66 |
| 1 |
Washington |
11.78 |
| 34 |
West
Virginia |
3.55 |
| 29 |
Wisconsin |
4.29 |
| 34 |
Wyoming |
3.55 |
|
Source: Hale &
Dorr, 2000 and 2001 data.
Go
to next indicator >>
2002 State Index Home | Introduction
| Overview &
Methodology | The Rankings
| Summary of Results
Development Strategies |
Data Sources
Weighting Methodology | Endnotes
| The Author
The Progressive
Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|