PPI Technology Project
 
NewEconomy
Index.org Home

 
2002 State Index Home
 
Introduction
 
Overview & Methodology
 
Overall Rankings
 
Summary of Results
 
THE INDICATORS
 
PART I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
 
Information Technology Jobs

Managerial, Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce Education

Education Level of the Manufacturing Workforce
 
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
 
Export Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign Direct Investment
 
PART III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
 
"Gazelle" Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
 
PART IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
 
Online Population

Commercial Internet Domain Names

Technology in Schools

Digital Government

Online Agriculture

Online Manufacturers

Broadband Telecommunications
 
PART V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
 
High-Tech Jobs

Scientists and Engineers

Patents

Industry Investment in R&D

Venture Capital
 
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
 
Data Sources
 
Weighting Methodology
 
Endnotes
 
The Author

The New Economy Index
The Metro New Economy Index
The 1999 New Economy Index

BROWSE BY STATE:
The State New Economy Index
PART 3: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
Initial Public Offerings
A weighted measure of the value and number of initial public stock offerings of companies as a share of gross state product. 18

"Even with the dramatic decline in IPOs in 2001... IPOs are expected to rebound at least to the levels of relatively strong years like 1997 and 1998."

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? In the last two decades, financial markets have embraced entrepreneurial dynamism. One measure of this is the number of initial public offerings (first rounds of companies' stock sold when they make their debut in public markets). IPOs rose by 50 percent between the 1960s and 1990s and reached unprecedented levels in 2000. But even with the dramatic decline in IPOs in 2001, as the economy grows in 2002, IPOs are expected to rebound at least to the levels of relatively strong years like 1997 and 1998.

THE RANKINGS: The top states for IPOs are also mostly states with high New Economy scores: Washington, Massachusetts, California, Colorado, Virginia, and Maryland. But the production of companies with high growth potential was not limited to what are commonly viewed as the high-tech leaders: states like Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, and Oklahoma also ranked high.

 
STATES BY RANK
Rank State Score
1 Washington 11.78
2 Massachusetts 10.78
3 California 9.06
4 Colorado 7.08
5 Illinois 6.85
6 Virginia 6.66
7 Maryland 6.49
8 Oklahoma 6.43
9 Connecticut 6.26
10 Missouri 6.23
11 Iowa 6.11
12 Pennsylvania 6.10
13 Minnesota 5.94
14 New Jersey 5.81
15 Georgia 5.78
16 Texas 5.41
17 New York 5.28
18 Arizona 5.21
19 Indiana 4.93
20 Florida 4.93
21 Utah 4.82
22 Maine 4.74
23 Oregon 4.61
24 Tennessee 4.60
25 Louisiana 4.54
26 North Carolina 4.51
27 New Hampshire 4.42
28 Nebraska 4.31
29 Wisconsin 4.29
30 Nevada 4.05
31 Kentucky 3.97
32 Michigan 3.96
33 Ohio 3.67
34 Delaware 3.55
34 Idaho 3.55
34 Rhode Island 3.55
34 New Mexico 3.55
34 Vermont 3.55
34 Kansas 3.55
34 Alaska 3.55
34 Hawaii 3.55
34 Montana 3.55
34 South Carolina 3.55
34 South Dakota 3.55
34 North Dakota 3.55
34 Wyoming 3.55
34 Alabama 3.55
34 Arkansas 3.55
34 Mississippi 3.55
34 West Virginia 3.55
U.S. Average 5.00%
    
ALPHABETICALLY
Rank State Score
34 Alabama 3.55
34 Alaska 3.55
18 Arizona 5.21
34 Arkansas 3.55
3 California 9.06
4 Colorado 7.08
9 Connecticut 6.26
34 Delaware 3.55
20 Florida 4.93
15 Georgia 5.78
34 Hawaii 3.55
34 Idaho 3.55
5 Illinois 6.85
19 Indiana 4.93
11 Iowa 6.11
34 Kansas 3.55
31 Kentucky 3.97
25 Louisiana 4.54
22 Maine 4.74
7 Maryland 6.49
2 Massachusetts 10.78
32 Michigan 3.96
13 Minnesota 5.94
34 Mississippi 3.55
10 Missouri 6.23
34 Montana 3.55
28 Nebraska 4.31
30 Nevada 4.05
27 New Hampshire 4.42
14 New Jersey 5.81
34 New Mexico 3.55
17 New York 5.28
26 North Carolina 4.51
34 North Dakota 3.55
33 Ohio 3.67
8 Oklahoma 6.43
23 Oregon 4.61
12 Pennsylvania 6.10
34 Rhode Island 3.55
34 South Carolina 3.55
34 South Dakota 3.55
24 Tennessee 4.60
16 Texas 5.41
21 Utah 4.82
34 Vermont 3.55
6 Virginia 6.66
1 Washington 11.78
34 West Virginia 3.55
29 Wisconsin 4.29
34 Wyoming 3.55

Source: Hale & Dorr, 2000 and 2001 data.

Printer-friendly page (Adobe PDF)


Go to next indicator >>



 
2002 State Index Home | Introduction | Overview &
Methodology
| The Rankings | Summary of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Weighting Methodology | Endnotes | The Author

pdf Download PDF Version of This Report (10 MB)
Please expect lengthy download time,
during which your browser window may appear blank.
(PDF version requires Acrobat Reader)
 
The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
 
 
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.