|

NewEconomy
Index.org Home
2002
State Index Home
Introduction
Overview &
Methodology
Overall Rankings
Summary of Results
THE INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Information
Technology Jobs

Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education

Education
Level of the Manufacturing Workforce
PART
II: GLOBALIZATION
Export
Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign
Direct Investment
PART
III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
"Gazelle"
Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
PART
IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
Online Population

Commercial
Internet Domain Names

Technology
in Schools

Digital
Government

Online Agriculture

Online Manufacturers

Broadband
Telecommunications
PART
V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
High-Tech
Jobs

Scientists
and Engineers

Patents

Industry
Investment in R&D

Venture
Capital
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Data Sources
Weighting Methodology
Endnotes
The Author



|
 |
Foreign
Direct Investment
The percentage
of each state's workforce by foreign companies.
"Incoming FDI continues to grow, from $137 billion in 1979, to
$305 billion in 1989, to $451 billion in 1999."
WHY
IS THIS IMPORTANT? Foreign direct investment (FDI) includes
significant investments by foreign companies, such as construction of
production facilities or ownership stakes taken in U.S. companies. Incoming
FDI continues to grow, from $137 billion in 1979, to $305 billion in 1989,
to $451 billion in 1999 (in constant 1999 dollars) and from 2.3 percent
of GDP, to 4.9 percent.
17
THE
RANKINGS: With the exception of Hawaii, which has the
top score because of its proximity to Asia, most states that score well
are on the East Coast. This is in large part because most FDI comes from
Europe and Canada. In 1999, Europe accounted for 65 percent of all FDI
in the United States, with Asia accounting for less than 20 percent. European
companies have invested in East Coast states in part because of their
proximity to their corporate headquarters and because of the access to
densely populated markets.
| STATES
BY RANK |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 1 |
Hawaii |
8.3% |
| 2 |
South
Carolina |
7.4% |
| 3 |
Delaware |
6.9% |
| 4 |
North
Carolina |
6.7% |
| 5 |
New
Jersey |
6.3% |
| 6 |
Connecticut |
6.2% |
| 7 |
Massachusetts |
6.0% |
| 8 |
New
Hampshire |
6.0% |
| 9 |
Tennessee |
5.7% |
| 10 |
Maine |
5.6% |
| 11 |
Indiana |
5.6% |
| 12 |
Georgia |
5.6% |
| 13 |
Kentucky |
5.4% |
| 14 |
Michigan |
5.4% |
| 15 |
Virginia |
5.0% |
| 16 |
New
York |
4.9% |
| 17 |
Illinois |
4.8% |
| 18 |
Pennsylvania |
4.7% |
| 19 |
Ohio |
4.7% |
| 20 |
Rhode
Island |
4.7% |
| 21 |
California |
4.6% |
| 22 |
Texas |
4.5% |
| 23 |
Colorado |
4.3% |
| 24 |
Florida |
4.2% |
| 25 |
Kansas |
4.2% |
| 26 |
Maryland |
4.1% |
| 27 |
Vermont |
4.1% |
| 28 |
Alabama |
4.1% |
| 29 |
West
Virginia |
3.8% |
| 30 |
Alaska |
3.8% |
| 31 |
Oregon |
3.7% |
| 32 |
Missouri |
3.7% |
| 33 |
Washington |
3.7% |
| 34 |
Wisconsin |
3.6% |
| 35 |
Montana |
3.6% |
| 36 |
Minnesota |
3.5% |
| 37 |
Idaho |
3.4% |
| 38 |
Utah |
3.3% |
| 39 |
Louisiana |
3.3% |
| 40 |
Nevada |
3.3% |
| 41 |
Arkansas |
3.3% |
| 42 |
Arizona |
3.3% |
| 43 |
Oklahoma |
3.0% |
| 44 |
Wyoming |
2.9% |
| 45 |
Nebraska |
2.8% |
| 46 |
Iowa |
2.7% |
| 47 |
North
Dakota |
2.4% |
| 48 |
New
Mexico |
2.2% |
| 49 |
Mississippi |
2.2% |
| 50 |
South
Dakota |
1.7% |
|
U.S.
Average |
4.7% |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 28 |
Alabama |
4.1% |
| 30 |
Alaska |
3.8% |
| 42 |
Arizona |
3.3% |
| 41 |
Arkansas |
3.3% |
| 21 |
California |
4.6% |
| 23 |
Colorado |
4.3% |
| 6 |
Connecticut |
6.2% |
| 3 |
Delaware |
6.9% |
| 24 |
Florida |
4.2% |
| 12 |
Georgia |
5.6% |
| 1 |
Hawaii |
8.3% |
| 37 |
Idaho |
3.4% |
| 17 |
Illinois |
4.8% |
| 11 |
Indiana |
5.6% |
| 46 |
Iowa |
2.7% |
| 25 |
Kansas |
4.2% |
| 13 |
Kentucky |
5.4% |
| 39 |
Louisiana |
3.3% |
| 10 |
Maine |
5.6% |
| 26 |
Maryland |
4.1% |
| 7 |
Massachusetts |
6.0% |
| 14 |
Michigan |
5.4% |
| 36 |
Minnesota |
3.5% |
| 49 |
Mississippi |
2.2% |
| 32 |
Missouri |
3.7% |
| 35 |
Montana |
3.6% |
| 45 |
Nebraska |
2.8% |
| 40 |
Nevada |
3.3% |
| 8 |
New
Hampshire |
6.0% |
| 5 |
New
Jersey |
6.3% |
| 48 |
New
Mexico |
2.2% |
| 16 |
New
York |
4.9% |
| 4 |
North
Carolina |
6.7% |
| 47 |
North
Dakota |
2.4% |
| 19 |
Ohio |
4.7% |
| 43 |
Oklahoma |
3.0% |
| 31 |
Oregon |
3.7% |
| 18 |
Pennsylvania |
4.7% |
| 20 |
Rhode
Island |
4.7% |
| 2 |
South
Carolina |
7.4% |
| 50 |
South
Dakota |
1.7% |
| 9 |
Tennessee |
5.7% |
| 22 |
Texas |
4.5% |
| 38 |
Utah |
3.3% |
| 27 |
Vermont |
4.1% |
| 15 |
Virginia |
5.0% |
| 33 |
Washington |
3.7% |
| 29 |
West
Virginia |
3.8% |
| 34 |
Wisconsin |
3.6% |
| 44 |
Wyoming |
2.9% |
|
Source: Bureau of
Economic Analysis, 1999 data.
Go
to next indicator >>
2002 State Index Home | Introduction
| Overview &
Methodology | The Rankings
| Summary of Results
Development Strategies |
Data Sources
Weighting Methodology | Endnotes
| The Author
The Progressive
Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|