|

NewEconomy
Index.org Home
2002
State Index Home
Introduction
Overview &
Methodology
Overall Rankings
Summary of Results
THE INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Information
Technology Jobs

Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education

Education
Level of the Manufacturing Workforce
PART
II: GLOBALIZATION
Export
Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign
Direct Investment
PART
III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
"Gazelle"
Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
PART
IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
Online Population

Commercial
Internet Domain Names

Technology
in Schools

Digital
Government

Online Agriculture

Online Manufacturers

Broadband
Telecommunications
PART
V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
High-Tech
Jobs

Scientists
and Engineers

Patents

Industry
Investment in R&D

Venture
Capital
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Data Sources
Weighting Methodology
Endnotes
The Author



|
 |
Export
Focus of Manufacturing
Value of exports
poer manufacturing worker. 14
"Workers employed in export oriented firms earn 10 percent more
than workers in similar firms that export less."
WHY
IS THIS IMPORTANT? Trade has become an integral part
of the U.S. and world economies. The combined total of U.S. exports and
imports has increased from less than 5.5 percent of GDP in 1950, to 11
percent in 1970, to 24 percent in 2000. Moreover, the United States is
increasingly specializing in more complex, higher value-added goods and
services, which is benefiting many American workers. Workers employed
in export-oriented firms earn 10 percent more than workers in similar
firms that export less, or don't export at all.
15 As a result, states whose companies
are not global traders risk being left behind.
16
THE
RANKINGS: The leading states are those that have high
value-added, technologically advanced manufacturing sectors, such as Delaware
and New Jersey (chemicals and pharmaceuticals), Washington (aviation),
and California, Colorado, New York, and Texas (electronics and instruments).
But even after holding constant the industry sectors' propensity to export,
the manufacturing companies in these states export more. Alaska is the
anomaly, but its high ranking is no doubt due to its high level of export
of processed natural resources and its proximity to Asia. States with
low rankings tend to have more lower value-added industries that compete
directly with lower-wage nations, making it more difficult to export (e.g.
Alabama, Arkansas, and Mississippi) or with mostly smaller firms who tend
to export less than larger firms (such as Maine and Rhode Island).
| STATES
BY RANK |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 1 |
Delaware |
$122,362
|
| 2 |
Alaska |
$115,098
|
| 3 |
Washington |
$82,911
|
| 4 |
New
York |
$71,676
|
| 5 |
New
Jersey |
$68,225
|
| 6 |
Colorado |
$66,182
|
| 7 |
Texas |
$65,281
|
| 8 |
California |
$65,021
|
| 9 |
Vermont |
$56,925
|
| 10 |
Florida |
$56,588
|
| 11 |
Michigan |
$53,783
|
| 12 |
Nevada |
$53,540
|
| 13 |
Minnesota |
$47,600
|
| 14 |
Connecticut |
$46,347
|
| 15 |
Oregon |
$44,549
|
| 16 |
Arizona |
$40,694
|
| 17 |
Idaho |
$39,778
|
| 18 |
Massachusetts |
$38,209
|
| 19 |
Illinois |
$37,726
|
| 20 |
Hawaii |
$34,699
|
| 21 |
Montana |
$33,385
|
| 22 |
Pennsylvania |
$33,165
|
| 23 |
Nebraska |
$33,079
|
| 24 |
North
Dakota |
$31,317
|
| 25 |
Virginia |
$31,182
|
| 26 |
Kentucky |
$31,120
|
| 27 |
Ohio |
$29,524
|
| 28 |
Maryland |
$29,243
|
| 29 |
Georgia |
$26,811
|
| 30 |
Tennessee |
$26,083
|
| 31 |
Kansas |
$24,100
|
| 32 |
South
Carolina |
$23,974
|
| 33 |
North
Carolina |
$23,904
|
| 34 |
Indiana |
$22,406
|
| 35 |
New
Hampshire |
$22,314
|
| 36 |
Wisconsin |
$21,403
|
| 37 |
Utah |
$21,286
|
| 38 |
Missouri |
$21,252
|
| 39 |
West
Virginia |
$20,361
|
| 40 |
Louisiana |
$20,058
|
| 41 |
Oklahoma |
$19,927
|
| 42 |
Alabama |
$19,717
|
| 43 |
Maine |
$19,657
|
| 44 |
Rhode
Island |
$18,154
|
| 45 |
Iowa |
$14,535
|
| 46 |
Wyoming |
$14,074
|
| 47 |
New
Mexico |
$12,980
|
| 48 |
Arkansas |
$11,110
|
| 49 |
Mississippi |
$9,650
|
| 50 |
South
Dakota |
$8,601
|
|
U.S.
Average |
$42,913 |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 42 |
Alabama |
$19,717
|
| 2 |
Alaska |
$115,098
|
| 16 |
Arizona |
$40,694
|
| 48 |
Arkansas |
$11,110
|
| 8 |
California |
$65,021
|
| 6 |
Colorado |
$66,182
|
| 14 |
Connecticut |
$46,347
|
| 1 |
Delaware |
$122,362
|
| 10 |
Florida |
$56,588
|
| 29 |
Georgia |
$26,811
|
| 20 |
Hawaii |
$34,699
|
| 17 |
Idaho |
$39,778
|
| 19 |
Illinois |
$37,726
|
| 34 |
Indiana |
$22,406
|
| 45 |
Iowa |
$14,535
|
| 31 |
Kansas |
$24,100
|
| 26 |
Kentucky |
$31,120
|
| 40 |
Louisiana |
$20,058
|
| 43 |
Maine |
$19,657
|
| 28 |
Maryland |
$29,243
|
| 18 |
Massachusetts |
$38,209
|
| 11 |
Michigan |
$53,783
|
| 13 |
Minnesota |
$47,600
|
| 49 |
Mississippi |
$9,650
|
| 38 |
Missouri |
$21,252
|
| 21 |
Montana |
$33,385
|
| 23 |
Nebraska |
$33,079
|
| 12 |
Nevada |
$53,540
|
| 35 |
New
Hampshire |
$22,314
|
| 5 |
New
Jersey |
$68,225
|
| 47 |
New
Mexico |
$12,980
|
| 4 |
New
York |
$71,676
|
| 33 |
North
Carolina |
$23,904
|
| 24 |
North
Dakota |
$31,317
|
| 27 |
Ohio |
$29,524
|
| 41 |
Oklahoma |
$19,927
|
| 15 |
Oregon |
$44,549
|
| 22 |
Pennsylvania |
$33,165
|
| 44 |
Rhode
Island |
$18,154
|
| 32 |
South
Carolina |
$23,974
|
| 50 |
South
Dakota |
$8,601
|
| 30 |
Tennessee |
$26,083
|
| 7 |
Texas |
$65,281
|
| 37 |
Utah |
$21,286
|
| 9 |
Vermont |
$56,925
|
| 25 |
Virginia |
$31,182
|
| 3 |
Washington |
$82,911
|
| 39 |
West
Virginia |
$20,361
|
| 36 |
Wisconsin |
$21,403
|
| 46 |
Wyoming |
$14,074
|
|
Source: U.S. Census,
2000 data.
Go
to next indicator >>
2002 State Index Home | Introduction
| Overview &
Methodology | The Rankings
| Summary of Results
Development Strategies |
Data Sources
Weighting Methodology | Endnotes
| The Author
The Progressive
Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|