
Go To Current Index 1999 State Index Home
Introduction
Overview & Methodology
Overall Rankings
Summary of Results
THE INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Office Jobs

Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign Direct Investment
PART III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
"Gazelle" Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
PART IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
Online Population

".com" Domain Name Registrations

Technology in Schools

Digital Government
PART V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Scientists and Engineers

Patents

Industry Investment in R&D

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Data Sources
Weighting System
Endnotes
The Authors


|
 |

PART V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
Innovation Capacity
In the old economy, economic growth stemmed from increases in the supply
of capital, labor, or natural resources. Growth in the New Economy stems
from increases in knowledge and innovation and its widespread adoption.
Technological innovation, in particular, is one of the fundamental drivers
of growth in the New Economy. Studies show that technological innovation
is responsible for over two-thirds of per-capita economic growth.23
States that score well on innovation indicators actually show lower rates
of job growth between 1991 and 1996 (there is an overall correlation of
-0.15 for the 50 states). However, they score much higher on rates of
growth in per-capita income (a correlation of 0.24). In other words, the
higher the score on innovation capacity, the faster the income of the
residents went up. As a result, if states want to boost the incomes of
their residents, embracing technological innovation is a key path.
The innovation capacity indicators in this section measure five things: 1) share of
jobs in high-tech industries; 2) scientists and engineers as a share of the workforce; 3)
the number of patents relative to the size of the workforce; 4) industry R&D as a
share of GSP; and 5) venture capital invested as a share of GSP.

| STATES BY RANK |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 1 |
Massachusetts |
16.25 |
| 2 |
California |
12.99 |
| 3 |
Delaware |
11.08 |
| 4 |
Colorado |
10.97 |
| 5 |
New Hampshire |
10.17 |
| 6 |
New Jersey |
9.95 |
| 7 |
Connecticut |
9.76 |
| 8 |
Washington |
8.84 |
| 9 |
New Mexico |
8.83 |
| 10 |
Minnesota |
8.58 |
| 11 |
Vermont |
8.37 |
| 12 |
Maryland |
8.04 |
| 13 |
Idaho |
7.79 |
| 14 |
Utah |
7.66 |
| 15 |
Michigan |
7.63 |
| 16 |
New York |
7.31 |
| 17 |
Texas |
6.72 |
| 18 |
Arizona |
6.64 |
| 19 |
Illinois |
6.60 |
| 20 |
Oregon |
6.59 |
| 21 |
Pennsylvania |
6.54 |
| 22 |
Rhode Island |
6.40 |
| 23 |
Virginia |
6.34 |
| 24 |
North Carolina |
5.94 |
| 25 |
Ohio |
5.31 |
| 26 |
Georgia |
5.25 |
| 27 |
Missouri |
5.11 |
| 28 |
Florida |
4.89 |
| 29 |
Indiana |
4.68 |
| 30 |
Wisconsin |
4.68 |
| 31 |
Tennessee |
4.64 |
| 32 |
Iowa |
4.05 |
| 33 |
Kansas |
4.02 |
| 34 |
South Carolina |
3.84 |
| 35 |
Maine |
3.71 |
| 36 |
Nebraska |
3.66 |
| 37 |
Montana |
3.57 |
| 38 |
Oklahoma |
3.54 |
| 39 |
Alabama |
3.48 |
| 40 |
South Dakota |
3.46 |
| 41 |
Hawaii |
3.09 |
| 42 |
Kentucky |
3.09 |
| 43 |
North Dakota |
3.03 |
| 44 |
Nevada |
3.01 |
| 45 |
Alaska |
2.90 |
| 46 |
West Virginia |
2.66 |
| 47 |
Louisiana |
2.39 |
| 48 |
Wyoming |
2.17 |
| 49 |
Mississippi |
1.90 |
| 50 |
Arkansas |
1.90 |
|
U.S. Average |
6 |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 39 |
Alabama |
3.48 |
| 45 |
Alaska |
2.90 |
| 18 |
Arizona |
6.64 |
| 50 |
Arkansas |
1.90 |
| 2 |
California |
12.99 |
| 4 |
Colorado |
10.97 |
| 7 |
Connecticut |
9.76 |
| 3 |
Delaware |
11.08 |
| 28 |
Florida |
4.89 |
| 26 |
Georgia |
5.25 |
| 41 |
Hawaii |
3.09 |
| 13 |
Idaho |
7.79 |
| 19 |
Illinois |
6.60 |
| 29 |
Indiana |
4.68 |
| 32 |
Iowa |
4.05 |
| 33 |
Kansas |
4.02 |
| 42 |
Kentucky |
3.09 |
| 47 |
Louisiana |
2.39 |
| 35 |
Maine |
3.71 |
| 12 |
Maryland |
8.04 |
| 1 |
Massachusetts |
16.25 |
| 15 |
Michigan |
7.63 |
| 10 |
Minnesota |
8.58 |
| 49 |
Mississippi |
1.90 |
| 27 |
Missouri |
5.11 |
| 37 |
Montana |
3.57 |
| 36 |
Nebraska |
3.66 |
| 44 |
Nevada |
3.01 |
| 5 |
New Hampshire |
10.17 |
| 6 |
New Jersey |
9.95 |
| 9 |
New Mexico |
8.83 |
| 16 |
New York |
7.31 |
| 24 |
North Carolina |
5.94 |
| 43 |
North Dakota |
3.03 |
| 25 |
Ohio |
5.31 |
| 38 |
Oklahoma |
3.54 |
| 20 |
Oregon |
6.59 |
| 21 |
Pennsylvania |
6.54 |
| 22 |
Rhode Island |
6.40 |
| 34 |
South Carolina |
3.84 |
| 40 |
South Dakota |
3.46 |
| 31 |
Tennessee |
4.64 |
| 17 |
Texas |
6.72 |
| 14 |
Utah |
7.66 |
| 11 |
Vermont |
8.37 |
| 23 |
Virginia |
6.34 |
| 8 |
Washington |
8.84 |
| 46 |
West Virginia |
2.66 |
| 30 |
Wisconsin |
4.68 |
| 48 |
Wyoming |
2.17 |
|
|
|
|
Go
to next indicator >>
State Index Home | Introduction
The Rankings | Summary
of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Appendix | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 546-0007
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|