
Go To Current Index 1999 State Index Home
Introduction
Overview & Methodology
Overall Rankings
Summary of Results
THE INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Office Jobs

Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign Direct Investment
PART III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
"Gazelle" Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
PART IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
Online Population

".com" Domain Name Registrations

Technology in Schools

Digital Government
PART V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Scientists and Engineers

Patents

Industry Investment in R&D

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Data Sources
Weighting System
Endnotes
The Authors


|
 |

PART IV: THE DIGITAL
ECONOMY
Technology in Schools
A weighted measure of the percentage of classrooms wired for the Internet,
teachers with technology training, and schools with more than 50 percent of teachers
having school-based e-mail accounts.
WHY
IS THIS IMPORTANT? While the jury is out on exactly how to
best integrate technology in the classroom, many believe computers and
the Internet can play a key role in improving education. In the meantime,
the use of information technology in Americas schools is growing.
The percentage of schools with at least one Internet connection has increased
rapidly, from 35 percent in 1994 to 78 percent in 1997. The percentage
of classrooms with Internet access has gone from 3 percent in 1994, to
27 percent in 1997, to 44 percent in 1998.22
THE
RANKINGS: States that are farthest ahead in integrating information technology
into schools appear to be less populated and more geographically dispersed, suggesting
that a motivating factor is the desire to establish better connections to information and
resources in other parts of the nation and the world. Political leaders in those states
may recognize that the IT revolution is an important key to their future prosperity and
that it is essential to properly train the next generation of workers. Of the top 20
states, only one, Delaware, could be considered to be densely populated. Many of the most
densely populated East Coast and Midwest states (including New York, New Jersey,
Connecticut, Maryland, Michigan, and Ohio) rank near the bottom.

| STATES BY
RANK |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 1 |
Alaska |
3.81 |
| 2 |
Washington |
3.79 |
| 3 |
Hawaii |
3.63 |
| 4 |
Nebraska |
3.16 |
| 5 |
Utah |
3.00 |
| 6 |
Kentucky |
2.97 |
| 7 |
Minnesota |
2.92 |
| 8 |
Maine |
2.92 |
| 9 |
Oregon |
2.82 |
| 10 |
Wyoming |
2.75 |
| 11 |
Iowa |
2.72 |
| 12 |
Vermont |
2.64 |
| 13 |
Colorado |
2.61 |
| 14 |
Delaware |
2.55 |
| 15 |
North Dakota |
2.55 |
| 16 |
Idaho |
2.54 |
| 17 |
South Dakota |
2.45 |
| 18 |
West Virginia |
2.38 |
| 19 |
Montana |
2.35 |
| 20 |
Tennessee |
2.34 |
| 21 |
Florida |
2.23 |
| 22 |
Wisconsin |
1.99 |
| 23 |
Indiana |
1.94 |
| 24 |
North Carolina |
1.93 |
| 25 |
Texas |
1.93 |
| 26 |
Virginia |
1.88 |
| 27 |
Kansas |
1.81 |
| 28 |
Missouri |
1.78 |
| 29 |
California |
1.76 |
| 30 |
South Carolina |
1.75 |
| 31 |
Arkansas |
1.67 |
| 32 |
Rhode Island |
1.61 |
| 33 |
Arizona |
1.60 |
| 34 |
Massachusetts |
1.53 |
| 35 |
Georgia |
1.51 |
| 36 |
Ohio |
1.49 |
| 37 |
New Hampshire |
1.42 |
| 38 |
Illinois |
1.42 |
| 39 |
Michigan |
1.40 |
| 40 |
Maryland |
1.38 |
| 41 |
New York |
1.36 |
| 42 |
Connecticut |
1.31 |
| 43 |
New Jersey |
0.99 |
| 44 |
New Mexico |
0.96 |
| 45 |
Pennsylvania |
0.93 |
| 46 |
Mississippi |
0.90 |
| 47 |
Nevada |
0.78 |
| 48 |
Alabama |
0.75 |
| 49 |
Louisiana |
0.68 |
| 50 |
Oklahoma |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
U.S. average |
2.00 |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| State |
Rank |
Score |
| Alabama |
48 |
0.75 |
| Alaska |
1 |
3.81 |
| Arizona |
33 |
1.60 |
| Arkansas |
31 |
1.67 |
| California |
29 |
1.76 |
| Colorado |
13 |
2.61 |
| Connecticut |
42 |
1.31 |
| Delaware |
14 |
2.55 |
| Florida |
21 |
2.23 |
| Georgia |
35 |
1.51 |
| Hawaii |
3 |
3.63 |
| Idaho |
16 |
2.54 |
| Illinois |
38 |
1.42 |
| Indiana |
23 |
1.94 |
| Iowa |
11 |
2.72 |
| Kansas |
27 |
1.81 |
| Kentucky |
6 |
2.97 |
| Louisiana |
49 |
0.68 |
| Maine |
8 |
2.92 |
| Maryland |
40 |
1.38 |
| Massachusetts |
34 |
1.53 |
| Michigan |
39 |
1.40 |
| Minnesota |
7 |
2.92 |
| Mississippi |
46 |
0.90 |
| Missouri |
28 |
1.78 |
| Montana |
19 |
2.35 |
| Nebraska |
4 |
3.16 |
| Nevada |
47 |
0.78 |
| New Hampshire |
37 |
1.42 |
| New Jersey |
43 |
0.99 |
| New Mexico |
44 |
0.96 |
| New York |
41 |
1.36 |
| North Carolina |
24 |
1.93 |
| North Dakota |
15 |
2.55 |
| Ohio |
36 |
1.49 |
| Oklahoma |
50 |
0.42 |
| Oregon |
9 |
2.82 |
| Pennsylvania |
45 |
0.93 |
| Rhode Island |
32 |
1.61 |
| South Carolina |
30 |
1.75 |
| South Dakota |
17 |
2.45 |
| Tennessee |
20 |
2.34 |
| Texas |
25 |
1.93 |
| Utah |
5 |
3.00 |
| Vermont |
12 |
2.64 |
| Virginia |
26 |
1.88 |
| Washington |
2 |
3.79 |
| West Virginia |
18 |
2.38 |
| Wisconsin |
22 |
1.99 |
| Wyoming |
10 |
2.75 |
|
Source: Education Week, 1997-1998 data.
Go
to next indicator >>
State Index Home | Introduction
The Rankings | Summary
of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Appendix | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 546-0007
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|