
Go To Current Index 1999 State Index Home
Introduction
Overview & Methodology
Overall Rankings
Summary of Results
THE INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Office Jobs

Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign Direct Investment
PART III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
"Gazelle" Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
PART IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
Online Population

".com" Domain Name Registrations

Technology in Schools

Digital Government
PART V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Scientists and Engineers

Patents

Industry Investment in R&D

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Data Sources
Weighting System
Endnotes
The Authors


|
 |

PART IV: THE DIGITAL
ECONOMY
Commercial Internet Domain Names
The number of commercial Internet domain names (.com) per firm.
WHY
IS THIS IMPORTANT? The New Economy is not just about the hippest,
high-flying Internet firms in Silicon Valley. Its also about all
of the ways companies everywhere are putting computers and information
technology to work. One way to quantify that is to look at the number
of companies that have created a presence for themselves on the World
Wide Web. Probably the most effective measure is the number of .com
domain names registered in each state.21
An Internet domain is an organizations unique name combined with
a top level domain designation such as .com, .org,
or .edu, denoting commercial sites, non-profit organizations,
or educational or research organizations, respectively. According to the
most recent data, there are some 2,228,000 .com domain names
registered in the United States.
THE
RANKINGS: The number of .com domains registered per firm varies
significantly from state to state. The highest-ranking state, Nevada, has almost six times
more than the lowest-ranking state, Mississippi. Nevadas first place finish could
well be a dubious distinction: it may be attributable to a large number of gambling and
pornographic sites. But most of the other top finishers, including California,
Massachusetts, Utah, Colorado, Virginia, and Washington, are among the most high-tech
states by almost any measure.

| STATES BY
RANK |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 1 |
Nevada |
0.46 |
| 2 |
California |
0.45 |
| 3 |
Massachusetts |
0.35 |
| 4 |
Arizona |
0.34 |
| 5 |
Utah |
0.32 |
| 6 |
Colorado |
0.32 |
| 7 |
Virginia |
0.31 |
| 8 |
Washington |
0.30 |
| 9 |
Maryland |
0.30 |
| 10 |
New Hampshire |
0.29 |
| 11 |
Oregon |
0.29 |
| 12 |
Florida |
0.28 |
| 13 |
Hawaii |
0.28 |
| 14 |
New York |
0.28 |
| 15 |
New Jersey |
0.28 |
| 16 |
Delaware |
0.27 |
| 17 |
Rhode Island |
0.26 |
| 18 |
Connecticut |
0.26 |
| 19 |
Vermont |
0.25 |
| 20 |
Illinois |
0.24 |
| 21 |
Texas |
0.24 |
| 22 |
Georgia |
0.24 |
| 23 |
Minnesota |
0.23 |
| 24 |
Alaska |
0.21 |
| 25 |
Pennsylvania |
0.20 |
| 26 |
Kansas |
0.20 |
| 27 |
Ohio |
0.20 |
| 28 |
Maine |
0.20 |
| 29 |
Missouri |
0.19 |
| 30 |
North Carolina |
0.19 |
| 31 |
Indiana |
0.18 |
| 32 |
Wisconsin |
0.18 |
| 33 |
Tennessee |
0.17 |
| 34 |
New Mexico |
0.17 |
| 35 |
Oklahoma |
0.17 |
| 36 |
Michigan |
0.17 |
| 37 |
Idaho |
0.16 |
| 38 |
South Carolina |
0.15 |
| 39 |
Wyoming |
0.15 |
| 40 |
Nebraska |
0.14 |
| 41 |
Montana |
0.14 |
| 42 |
Kentucky |
0.13 |
| 43 |
Alabama |
0.13 |
| 44 |
Louisiana |
0.13 |
| 45 |
Iowa |
0.13 |
| 46 |
West Virginia |
0.11 |
| 47 |
South Dakota |
0.11 |
| 48 |
Arkansas |
0.11 |
| 49 |
North Dakota |
0.09 |
| 50 |
Mississippi |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
U.S. average |
0.26 |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| State |
Rank |
Score |
| Alabama |
43 |
0.13 |
| Alaska |
24 |
0.21 |
| Arizona |
4 |
0.34 |
| Arkansas |
48 |
0.11 |
| California |
2 |
0.45 |
| Colorado |
6 |
0.32 |
| Connecticut |
18 |
0.26 |
| Delaware |
16 |
0.27 |
| Florida |
12 |
0.28 |
| Georgia |
22 |
0.24 |
| Hawaii |
13 |
0.28 |
| Idaho |
37 |
0.16 |
| Illinois |
20 |
0.24 |
| Indiana |
31 |
0.18 |
| Iowa |
45 |
0.13 |
| Kansas |
26 |
0.20 |
| Kentucky |
42 |
0.13 |
| Louisiana |
44 |
0.13 |
| Maine |
28 |
0.20 |
| Maryland |
9 |
0.30 |
| Massachusetts |
3 |
0.35 |
| Michigan |
36 |
0.17 |
| Minnesota |
23 |
0.23 |
| Mississippi |
50 |
0.08 |
| Missouri |
29 |
0.19 |
| Montana |
41 |
0.14 |
| Nebraska |
40 |
0.14 |
| Nevada |
1 |
0.46 |
| New Hampshire |
10 |
0.29 |
| New Jersey |
15 |
0.28 |
| New Mexico |
34 |
0.17 |
| New York |
14 |
0.28 |
| North Carolina |
30 |
0.19 |
| North Dakota |
49 |
0.09 |
| Ohio |
27 |
0.20 |
| Oklahoma |
35 |
0.17 |
| Oregon |
11 |
0.29 |
| Pennsylvania |
25 |
0.20 |
| Rhode Island |
17 |
0.26 |
| South Carolina |
38 |
0.15 |
| South Dakota |
47 |
0.11 |
| Tennessee |
33 |
0.17 |
| Texas |
21 |
0.24 |
| Utah |
5 |
0.32 |
| Vermont |
19 |
0.25 |
| Virginia |
7 |
0.31 |
| Washington |
8 |
0.30 |
| West Virginia |
46 |
0.11 |
| Wisconsin |
32 |
0.18 |
| Wyoming |
39 |
0.15 |
|
Source: Anthony Townsend, Department of Urban Studies and
Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1999 data.
Go
to next indicator >>
State Index Home | Introduction
The Rankings | Summary
of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Appendix | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 546-0007
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|