PPI Technology Project
 
Go To Current Index
 
1999 State Index Home
 
Introduction
 
Overview & Methodology
 
Overall Rankings
 
Summary of Results
THE INDICATORS

PART I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
 
Office Jobs

Managerial, Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce Education
 
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
 
Export Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign Direct Investment
 
PART III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
 
"Gazelle" Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
 
PART IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
 
Online Population

".com" Domain Name Registrations

Technology in Schools

Digital Government
 
PART V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
 
High-Tech Jobs

Scientists and Engineers

Patents

Industry Investment in R&D

Venture Capital
 
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
 
Data Sources
 
Weighting System
 
Endnotes
 
The Authors

Click Here

The State New Economy Index
PART III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM

Job Churning

The number of new start-ups and business failures,
combined, as a share of all companies in each state.

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? Steady growth in employment masks the constant churning of job creation and destruction, as less innovative and efficient companies downsize or go out of business and more innovative and efficient companies grow and take their place. A total of 3.5 million private-sector jobs were added to the U.S. economy between 1994 and 1995, but that was after new firms had created 5.7 million jobs, failing firms had eliminated 4.5 million jobs, expanding firms had added 10.5 million jobs, and contracting firms had eliminated 8.2 million others. This churning has accelerated as the number of new start-ups and existing business failures per year has grown. While such turbulence increases the economic risk faced by workers, companies, and even regions, it is also a major driver of economic innovation and growth.

THE RANKINGS: Some fast-growing states (like Nevada, Colorado, Arizona, and Utah) have seen a great deal of churning. In part, this is because fast-growing economies produce more start-ups, especially in locally focused industries (such as restaurants, dry cleaning, or accounting). But a high churn rate also reflects a dynamism that leads to the death of old, outmoded firms and the creation of innovative new companies that sell outside the state. States with slower overall growth rates, but with dynamic business sectors, such as New Jersey, Maryland, and California, also see high rates of churn.

 
STATES BY RANK
Rank State Score
1 Nevada 4.1%
2 California 3.6%
3 Colorado 3.5%
4 New Jersey 3.4%
5 Arizona 3.3%
6 Utah 3.1%
7 New York 3.0%
8 Georgia 3.0%
9 Maryland 3.0%
10 Hawaii 2.9%
11 Idaho 2.9%
12 Washington 2.8%
13 Texas 2.8%
14 Arkansas 2.8%
15 Oklahoma 2.8%
16 Florida 2.8%
17 Tennessee 2.7%
18 Massachusetts 2.6%
19 Pennsylvania 2.5%
20 Delaware 2.5%
21 Virginia 2.5%
22 New Hampshire 2.5%
23 New Mexico 2.5%
24 Illinois 2.4%
25 Kansas 2.4%
26 Oregon 2.3%
27 North Carolina 2.3%
28 Ohio 2.3%
29 Alabama 2.3%
30 Kentucky 2.3%
31 Michigan 2.2%
32 Indiana 2.2%
33 Maine 2.1%
34 South Carolina 2.1%
35 Wisconsin 2.1%
36 Missouri 2.0%
37 West Virginia 2.0%
38 Connecticut 1.9%
39 Wyoming 1.9%
40 Rhode Island 1.9%
41 Louisiana 1.8%
42 Alaska 1.8%
43 Nebraska 1.8%
44 Mississippi 1.7%
45 Minnesota 1.7%
46 South Dakota 1.7%
47 Vermont 1.5%
48 Montana 1.5%
49 Iowa 1.4%
50 North Dakota 1.3%
U.S. average16 2.7%
    
ALPHABETICALLY
State Rank Score
Alabama 29 2.3%
Alaska 42 1.8%
Arizona 5 3.3%
Arkansas 14 2.8%
California 2 3.6%
Colorado 3 3.5%
Connecticut 38 1.9%
Delaware 20 2.5%
Florida 16 2.8%
Georgia 8 3.0%
Hawaii 10 2.9%
Idaho 11 2.9%
Illinois 24 2.4%
Indiana 32 2.2%
Iowa 49 1.4%
Kansas 25 2.4%
Kentucky 30 2.3%
Louisiana 41 1.8%
Maine 33 2.1%
Maryland 9 3.0%
Massachusetts 18 2.6%
Michigan 31 2.2%
Minnesota 45 1.7%
Mississippi 44 1.7%
Missouri 36 2.0%
Montana 48 1.5%
Nebraska 43 1.8%
Nevada 1 4.1%
New Hampshire 22 2.5%
New Jersey 4 3.4%
New Mexico 23 2.5%
New York 7 3.0%
North Carolina 27 2.3%
North Dakota 50 1.3%
Ohio 28 2.3%
Oklahoma 15 2.8%
Oregon 26 2.3%
Pennsylvania 19 2.5%
Rhode Island 40 1.9%
South Carolina 34 2.1%
South Dakota 46 1.7%
Tennessee 17 2.7%
Texas 13 2.8%
Utah 6 3.1%
Vermont 47 1.5%
Virginia 21 2.5%
Washington 12 2.8%
West Virginia 37 2.0%
Wisconsin 35 2.1%
Wyoming 39 1.9%

Source: Dun & Bradstreet, 1995-1996 data.

Go to next indicator >>

 


 
State Index Home | Introduction
The Rankings | Summary of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Appendix | Endnotes | The Authors

pdf Download PDF Version of This Report (1.1MB)
(PDF version requires Acrobat Reader)
 
 
The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 546-0007
www.ppionline.org
 
 
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.