
Go To Current Index 1999 State Index Home
Introduction
Overview & Methodology
Overall Rankings
Summary of Results
THE INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Office Jobs

Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign Direct Investment
PART III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
"Gazelle" Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
PART IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
Online Population

".com" Domain Name Registrations

Technology in Schools

Digital Government
PART V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Scientists and Engineers

Patents

Industry Investment in R&D

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Data Sources
Weighting System
Endnotes
The Authors


|
 |

PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus of Manufacturing
The share of jobs in manufacturing companies dependent upon exports.
WHY
IS THIS IMPORTANT? Trade has become an integral part of the
U.S. and world economies. The combined total of U.S. exports and imports
has increased from less than 5.5 percent of GDP in 1950, to 11 percent
in 1970, to 25 percent in 1997. Moreover, the United States is increasingly
specializing in more complex, higher value-added goods and services, which
is reflected in the fact that the average weight of a dollars worth
of American exports is less than half of what it was in 1970. That focus
on higher value-added goods and services is benefitting many American
workers. Workers employed in export-oriented firms earn 10 percent more
than workers in similar firms that export less, or that dont export
at all.14 As a result, states whose companies
are not global traders will be left behind, as will their workforces.
THE
RANKINGS: There are three types of states with high rankings in the export
orientation indicator: states such as Alaska and Idaho, which export processed natural
resources (enduring old economy strengths); states such as Massachusetts, Texas, and
California, which export high-tech equipment; and states such as Michigan, Ohio, Illinois,
Delaware, and West Virginia, which produce high value-added, durable manufactured
goods or chemicals. Some states, such as Oregon, Washington, and New Hampshire, have
high rankings because of both high-tech and natural resource exports. In contrast, states
with low rankings tend to have more traditional manufacturing industries that compete
directly with lower-wage nations, making it more difficult to export (as in Mississippi,
Virginia, and Arkansas).

| STATES BY
RANK |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 1 |
Alaska |
49.3% |
| 2 |
Washington |
31.2% |
| 3 |
Connecticut |
24.2% |
| 4 |
Texas |
23.9% |
| 5 |
Massachusetts |
22.7% |
| 6 |
Idaho |
22.0% |
| 7 |
New Hampshire |
21.2% |
| 8 |
Oregon |
20.9% |
| 9 |
Arizona |
20.8% |
| 10 |
California |
20.5% |
| 11 |
Michigan |
20.4% |
| 12 |
West Virginia |
20.2% |
| 13 |
Ohio |
20.0% |
| 14 |
Delaware |
19.9% |
| 15 |
Illinois |
18.6% |
| 16 |
Vermont |
18.5% |
| 17 |
Colorado |
18.2% |
| 18 |
Maine |
18.1% |
| 19 |
New York |
18.0% |
| 20 |
Minnesota |
18.0% |
| 21 |
Rhode Island |
18.0% |
| 22 |
South Carolina |
18.0% |
| 23 |
Indiana |
17.8% |
| 24 |
Pennsylvania |
17.7% |
| 25 |
Utah |
17.7% |
| 26 |
New Jersey |
17.3% |
| 27 |
Wisconsin |
17.3% |
| 28 |
Louisiana |
17.0% |
| 29 |
Kentucky |
16.6% |
| 30 |
South Dakota |
16.5% |
| 31 |
Oklahoma |
16.0% |
| 32 |
Tennessee |
15.7% |
| 33 |
Kansas |
15.7% |
| 34 |
Maryland |
15.6% |
| 35 |
Alabama |
15.6% |
| 36 |
Missouri |
15.3% |
| 37 |
North Carolina |
15.2% |
| 38 |
Nevada |
15.2% |
| 39 |
Iowa |
14.9% |
| 40 |
Georgia |
14.8% |
| 41 |
Arkansas |
14.7% |
| 42 |
New Mexico |
14.5% |
| 43 |
Wyoming |
14.3% |
| 44 |
Montana |
14.1% |
| 45 |
Hawaii |
14.0% |
| 46 |
Virginia |
14.0% |
| 47 |
Nebraska |
13.7% |
| 48 |
Mississippi |
12.9% |
| 49 |
North Dakota |
12.2% |
| 50 |
Florida |
7.9% |
|
|
|
|
U.S. average |
18.1% |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| State |
Rank |
Score |
| Alabama |
35 |
15.6% |
| Alaska |
1 |
49.3% |
| Arizona |
9 |
20.8% |
| Arkansas |
41 |
14.7% |
| California |
10 |
20.5% |
| Colorado |
17 |
18.2% |
| Connecticut |
3 |
24.2% |
| Delaware |
14 |
19.9% |
| Florida |
50 |
7.9% |
| Georgia |
40 |
14.8% |
| Hawaii |
45 |
14.0% |
| Idaho |
6 |
22.0% |
| Illinois |
15 |
18.6% |
| Indiana |
23 |
17.8% |
| Iowa |
39 |
14.9% |
| Kansas |
33 |
15.7% |
| Kentucky |
29 |
16.6% |
| Louisiana |
28 |
17.0% |
| Maine |
18 |
18.1% |
| Maryland |
34 |
15.6% |
| Massachusetts |
5 |
22.7% |
| Michigan |
11 |
20.4% |
| Minnesota |
20 |
18.0% |
| Mississippi |
48 |
12.9% |
| Missouri |
36 |
15.3% |
| Montana |
44 |
14.1% |
| Nebraska |
47 |
13.7% |
| Nevada |
38 |
15.2% |
| New Hampshire |
7 |
21.2% |
| New Jersey |
26 |
17.3% |
| New Mexico |
42 |
14.5% |
| New York |
19 |
18.0% |
| North Carolina |
37 |
15.2% |
| North Dakota |
49 |
12.2% |
| Ohio |
13 |
20.0% |
| Oklahoma |
31 |
16.0% |
| Oregon |
8 |
20.9% |
| Pennsylvania |
24 |
17.7% |
| Rhode Island |
21 |
18.0% |
| South Carolina |
22 |
18.0% |
| South Dakota |
30 |
16.5% |
| Tennessee |
32 |
15.7% |
| Texas |
4 |
23.9% |
| Utah |
25 |
17.7% |
| Vermont |
16 |
18.5% |
| Virginia |
46 |
14.0% |
| Washington |
2 |
31.2% |
| West Virginia |
12 |
20.2% |
| Wisconsin |
27 |
17.3% |
| Wyoming |
43 |
14.3% |
|
Source: U.S. Census, 1992 data.
Go
to next indicator >>
State Index Home | Introduction
The Rankings | Summary
of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Appendix | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 546-0007
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|