
Go To Current Index 1999 State Index Home
Introduction
Overview & Methodology
Overall Rankings
Summary of Results
THE INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Office Jobs

Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign Direct Investment
PART III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
"Gazelle" Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
PART IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
Online Population

".com" Domain Name Registrations

Technology in Schools

Digital Government
PART V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Scientists and Engineers

Patents

Industry Investment in R&D

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Data Sources
Weighting System
Endnotes
The Authors


|
 |

PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Globalization
While the old economy was national in its scope, the New Economy is global.
It is estimated that more than $21 trillion of the world economys
combined output will be open to global competition in 2000, up from $4
trillion in 1995.12 This growth will be
driven by global capital markets, reduced economic and trade barriers,
andperhaps most importantlytechnological change, which makes
it easier to locate enterprises and sell products and services almost
anywhere. When the old economy emerged in the 1930s, the winners were
states whose businesses sold to national markets, as opposed to local
or regional ones. At the beginning of the 21st century, the winners will
be the states whose businesses are most integrated into the world economy.
Despite the current slowdown in many nations, a global orientation ensures
expanding markets for a states industries. Since the workforce of
globally oriented firms also earns more than other firms, a global orientation
means that a states workforce will have a higher standard of living.
The globalization indicators in this section measure two things: 1) the
extent to which the states manufacturing workforce is employed producing
goods for export13 and 2) the share of
the workforce employed by foreign-owned companies.

| STATES BY
RANK |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 1 |
Alaska |
11.30 |
| 2 |
Hawaii |
8.90 |
| 3 |
South Carolina |
8.10 |
| 4 |
Connecticut |
8.09 |
| 5 |
Massachusetts |
8.00 |
| 6 |
Washington |
7.94 |
| 7 |
New Hampshire |
7.52 |
| 8 |
North Carolina |
7.31 |
| 9 |
New Jersey |
7.03 |
| 10 |
Texas |
6.86 |
| 11 |
Maine |
6.82 |
| 12 |
Delaware |
6.73 |
| 13 |
Ohio |
6.68 |
| 14 |
Tennessee |
6.61 |
| 15 |
Kentucky |
6.52 |
| 16 |
Georgia |
6.51 |
| 17 |
California |
6.49 |
| 18 |
New York |
6.41 |
| 19 |
Indiana |
6.36 |
| 20 |
Illinois |
6.30 |
| 21 |
Pennsylvania |
6.30 |
| 22 |
Rhode Island |
6.29 |
| 23 |
West Virginia |
6.27 |
| 24 |
Michigan |
6.19 |
| 25 |
Oregon |
6.04 |
| 26 |
Minnesota |
5.90 |
| 27 |
Colorado |
5.88 |
| 28 |
Arizona |
5.80 |
| 29 |
Virginia |
5.78 |
| 30 |
Utah |
5.73 |
| 31 |
Vermont |
5.72 |
| 32 |
Idaho |
5.50 |
| 33 |
Maryland |
5.49 |
| 34 |
Louisiana |
5.28 |
| 35 |
Kansas |
5.26 |
| 36 |
Alabama |
5.16 |
| 37 |
Nevada |
5.13 |
| 38 |
Missouri |
5.06 |
| 39 |
Wisconsin |
5.05 |
| 40 |
Arkansas |
4.95 |
| 41 |
Oklahoma |
4.68 |
| 42 |
Iowa |
4.53 |
| 43 |
Wyoming |
4.52 |
| 44 |
New Mexico |
4.26 |
| 45 |
South Dakota |
4.10 |
| 46 |
Nebraska |
4.09 |
| 47 |
Florida |
3.93 |
| 48 |
Mississippi |
3.80 |
| 49 |
Montana |
3.42 |
| 50 |
North Dakota |
3.40 |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Average |
6 |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| State |
Rank |
Score |
| Alabama |
36 |
5.16 |
| Alaska |
1 |
11.30 |
| Arizona |
28 |
5.80 |
| Arkansas |
40 |
4.95 |
| California |
17 |
6.49 |
| Colorado |
27 |
5.88 |
| Connecticut |
4 |
8.09 |
| Delaware |
12 |
6.73 |
| Florida |
47 |
3.93 |
| Georgia |
16 |
6.51 |
| Hawaii |
2 |
8.90 |
| Idaho |
32 |
5.50 |
| Illinois |
20 |
6.30 |
| Indiana |
19 |
6.36 |
| Iowa |
42 |
4.53 |
| Kansas |
35 |
5.26 |
| Kentucky |
15 |
6.52 |
| Louisiana |
34 |
5.28 |
| Maine |
11 |
6.82 |
| Maryland |
33 |
5.49 |
| Massachusetts |
5 |
8.00 |
| Michigan |
24 |
6.19 |
| Minnesota |
26 |
5.90 |
| Mississippi |
48 |
3.80 |
| Missouri |
38 |
5.06 |
| Montana |
49 |
3.42 |
| Nebraska |
46 |
4.09 |
| Nevada |
37 |
5.13 |
| New Hampshire |
7 |
7.52 |
| New Jersey |
9 |
7.03 |
| New Mexico |
44 |
4.26 |
| New York |
18 |
6.41 |
| North Carolina |
8 |
7.31 |
| North Dakota |
50 |
3.40 |
| Ohio |
13 |
6.68 |
| Oklahoma |
41 |
4.68 |
| Oregon |
25 |
6.04 |
| Pennsylvania |
21 |
6.30 |
| Rhode Island |
22 |
6.29 |
| South Carolina |
3 |
8.10 |
| South Dakota |
45 |
4.10 |
| Tennessee |
14 |
6.61 |
| Texas |
10 |
6.86 |
| Utah |
30 |
5.73 |
| Vermont |
31 |
5.72 |
| Virginia |
29 |
5.78 |
| Washington |
6 |
7.94 |
| West Virginia |
23 |
6.27 |
| Wisconsin |
39 |
5.05 |
| Wyoming |
43 |
4.52 |
|
Go
to next indicator >>
State Index Home | Introduction
The Rankings | Summary
of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Appendix | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 546-0007
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|