
Go To Current Index 1999 State Index Home
Introduction
Overview & Methodology
Overall Rankings
Summary of Results
THE INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Office Jobs

Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus of Manufacturing

Foreign Direct Investment
PART III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
"Gazelle" Jobs

Job Churning

IPOs
PART IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
Online Population

".com" Domain Name Registrations

Technology in Schools

Digital Government
PART V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Scientists and Engineers

Patents

Industry Investment in R&D

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
Data Sources
Weighting System
Endnotes
The Authors


|
 |

PART I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Office Jobs
Jobs in offices as a share of the total number of jobs in each state.
WHY IS
THIS IMPORTANT? The New Economy is a services, high-tech, and office economy.
This is not to say that mass production manufacturing or agriculture are unimportant, or
that the United States produces fewer manufactured goods or food. In fact, we produce more
than ever. But higher rates of productivity growth in manufacturing and agriculture have
meant that almost 93 million workers (80 percent of the U.S. workforce) do not spend their
days making thingsinstead, they work in jobs that require them to move things,
process or generate information, or provide services to people. The tools most Americans
use are now more likely to be the fax, copier, telephone, or personal computer than the
riveter or lathe. As competitive advantage increasingly stems from customization, design
quality, and customer service, the office has become the factory floor of the New Economy:
it is where an increasing share of the value added is produced.
THE
RANKINGS: States with a large share of jobs in offices tend to have more than
their share of financial services, high-tech, or corporate or regional headquarters.
States with relatively few jobs in offices tend to have economies rooted in agriculture,
natural resources, or branch-plant manufacturing.

| STATES BY
RANK |
| Rank |
State |
Score |
| 1 |
Delaware |
26.7% |
| 2 |
Massachusetts |
26.4% |
| 3 |
New York |
26.4% |
| 4 |
Connecticut |
24.3% |
| 5 |
Illinois |
22.9% |
| 6 |
New Jersey |
21.7% |
| 7 |
Minnesota |
21.5% |
| 8 |
Florida |
21.2% |
| 9 |
Rhode Island |
21.2% |
| 10 |
Pennsylvania |
20.8% |
| 11 |
Nevada |
20.5% |
| 12 |
Missouri |
20.2% |
| 13 |
Nebraska |
20.1% |
| 14 |
Ohio |
20.0% |
| 15 |
Colorado |
19.1% |
| 16 |
Hawaii |
19.1% |
| 17 |
California |
19.0% |
| 18 |
Georgia |
18.8% |
| 19 |
Tennessee |
18.8% |
| 20 |
Utah |
18.7% |
| 21 |
Virginia |
18.7% |
| 22 |
Maryland |
18.7% |
| 23 |
Wisconsin |
18.6% |
| 24 |
Michigan |
18.6% |
| 25 |
Texas |
18.6% |
| 26 |
Arizona |
18.5% |
| 27 |
Louisiana |
18.2% |
| 28 |
Iowa |
17.7% |
| 29 |
New Hampshire |
17.6% |
| 30 |
North Carolina |
17.2% |
| 31 |
Oregon |
17.1% |
| 32 |
Washington |
16.8% |
| 33 |
Kansas |
16.7% |
| 34 |
Indiana |
16.7% |
| 35 |
Oklahoma |
16.4% |
| 36 |
Alabama |
16.2% |
| 37 |
South Carolina |
15.8% |
| 38 |
New Mexico |
15.3% |
| 39 |
Maine |
15.2% |
| 40 |
Kentucky |
15.2% |
| 41 |
South Dakota |
15.0% |
| 42 |
Arkansas |
15.0% |
| 43 |
West Virginia |
14.6% |
| 44 |
Vermont |
14.3% |
| 45 |
North Dakota |
14.2% |
| 46 |
Mississippi |
13.8% |
| 47 |
Idaho |
13.3% |
| 48 |
Alaska |
12.6% |
| 49 |
Montana |
11.7% |
| 50 |
Wyoming |
10.7% |
|
|
|
|
U.S. average |
19.6% |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| State |
Rank |
Score |
| Alabama |
36 |
16.2% |
| Alaska |
48 |
12.6% |
| Arizona |
26 |
18.5% |
| Arkansas |
42 |
15.0% |
| California |
17 |
19.0% |
| Colorado |
15 |
19.1% |
| Connecticut |
4 |
24.3% |
| Delaware |
1 |
26.7% |
| Florida |
8 |
21.2% |
| Georgia |
18 |
18.8% |
| Hawaii |
16 |
19.1% |
| Idaho |
47 |
13.3% |
| Illinois |
5 |
22.9% |
| Indiana |
34 |
16.7% |
| Iowa |
28 |
17.7% |
| Kansas |
33 |
16.7% |
| Kentucky |
40 |
15.2% |
| Louisiana |
27 |
18.2% |
| Maine |
39 |
15.2% |
| Maryland |
22 |
18.7% |
| Massachusetts |
2 |
26.4% |
| Michigan |
24 |
18.6% |
| Minnesota |
7 |
21.5% |
| Mississippi |
46 |
13.8% |
| Missouri |
12 |
20.2% |
| Montana |
49 |
11.7% |
| Nebraska |
13 |
20.1% |
| Nevada |
11 |
20.5% |
| New Hampshire |
29 |
17.6% |
| New Jersey |
6 |
21.7% |
| New Mexico |
38 |
15.3% |
| New York |
3 |
26.4% |
| North Carolina |
30 |
17.2% |
| North Dakota |
45 |
14.2% |
| Ohio |
14 |
20.0% |
| Oklahoma |
35 |
16.4% |
| Oregon |
31 |
17.1% |
| Pennsylvania |
10 |
20.8% |
| Rhode Island |
9 |
21.2% |
| South Carolina |
37 |
15.8% |
| South Dakota |
41 |
15.0% |
| Tennessee |
19 |
18.8% |
| Texas |
25 |
18.6% |
| Utah |
20 |
18.7% |
| Vermont |
44 |
14.3% |
| Virginia |
21 |
18.7% |
| Washington |
32 |
16.8% |
| West Virginia |
43 |
14.6% |
| Wisconsin |
23 |
18.6% |
| Wyoming |
50 |
10.7% |
|
Source: Cognetics, 1997 data.
Go
to next indicator >>
State Index Home | Introduction
The Rankings | Summary
of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Appendix | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 546-0007
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|