|

NewEconomy
Index.org Home
Metro Index Home
Introduction
Overview &
Methodology
The Rankings
Summary of Results
THE
INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus
of Manufacturing
PART III: ECONOMIC
DYNAMISM
"Gazelle"
Jobs

Job Churning

New Publicly
Traded Companies
PART IV: THE DIGITAL
ECONOMY
Online Population

Broadband Telecommunications
Capacity

Computer Use
in Schools

Commercial Internet
Domain Names

Internet
Backbone
PART V: INNOVATION
CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Degrees Granted
in Science and Engineering

Patents

Academic Research
and Development Funding

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGIES
Data Sources
The Metropolitan
Areas and their Major Cities
Weighting Methodology
Endnotes
The Authors

|
 |
Degrees Granted in Science
and Engineering
A weighted measure of the degrees granted in scientific and technical
fields as a share of the workforce.27
Why Is
This Important?
In the New Economy, the key engines of growth - technology and research-based
companies and industries - are fueled by a large and high-caliber scientific
and engineering workforce. Moreover, there is a critical shortage of scientists,
engineers, and computer programmers, as demand surges while supply graduating
from United States' universities stagnates, or even in some cases declines.
So growing a high-quality, scientific workforce is critical to boosting
innovation and productivity.
The Rankings:
With the exception of Boston, which has more students enrolled in colleges
than any other metro area, the top-ranked metros tend to be smaller "college
towns" with large research universities, such as Research Triangle
Park (Duke, UNC, NC State), Austin (University of Texas), and Buffalo
(SUNY Buffalo). The Northeastern metropolitan areas lead the nation. Metro
areas that lag behind tend to be in the South and Southwest, which with
a few exceptions (Raleigh, Austin, Atlanta) do not have leading research
universities. This lack of top-flight universities hampers the ability
of metros in these regions to prosper.

 |
 |
100th-76th
Percentile |
 |
 |
75th-51st
Percentile |
 |
 |
50th-26th
Percentile |
 |
 |
25th-1st
Percentile |
| METRO
AREAS BY RANK |
| Rank |
Metro Area |
Score |
| 1 |
Raleigh-Durham |
12.9 |
| 2 |
Austin |
11.8 |
| 3 |
Boston |
11.3 |
| 4 |
Buffalo |
11.2 |
| 5 |
Dayton |
11.1 |
| 6 |
Rochester |
11.1 |
| 7 |
Columbus |
10.8 |
| 8 |
Pittsburgh |
10.7 |
| 9 |
Hartford |
10.6 |
| 10 |
Sacramento |
10.5 |
| 11 |
Washington |
10.5 |
| 12 |
Denver |
10.5 |
| 13 |
Oklahoma City |
10.4 |
| 14 |
Detroit |
10.3 |
| 15 |
St. Louis |
10.3 |
| 16 |
Philadelphia |
10.2 |
| 17 |
New Orleans |
10.2 |
| 18 |
Norfolk |
10.2 |
| 19 |
San Diego |
10.2 |
| 20 |
New York |
10.1 |
| 21 |
Cincinnati |
10.0 |
| 22 |
Salt Lake City |
10.0 |
| 23 |
Nashville |
9.9 |
| 24 |
Cleveland |
9.9 |
| 25 |
Chicago |
9.9 |
| 26 |
Richmond |
9.8 |
| 27 |
Minneapolis |
9.8 |
| 28 |
Greensboro |
9.8 |
| 29 |
San Francisco |
9.7 |
| 30 |
Los Angeles |
9.7 |
| 31 |
Seattle |
9.7 |
| 32 |
Atlanta |
9.7 |
| 33 |
Tampa |
9.6 |
| 34 |
Milwaukee |
9.6 |
| 35 |
San Antonio |
9.6 |
| 36 |
Portland |
9.6 |
| 37 |
Indianapolis |
9.6 |
| 38 |
Phoenix |
9.5 |
| 39 |
Orlando |
9.5 |
| 40 |
Miami |
9.5 |
| 41 |
West Palm Beach |
9.4 |
| 42 |
Louisville |
9.4 |
| 43 |
Grand Rapids |
9.3 |
| 44 |
Dallas |
9.3 |
| 45 |
Kansas City |
9.3 |
| 46 |
Memphis |
9.3 |
| 47 |
Houston |
9.3 |
| 48 |
Charlotte |
9.3 |
| 49 |
Jacksonville |
9.0 |
| 50 |
Las Vegas |
8.7 |
|
U.S. Average |
4.4 |
|
Top 50 Metro Average |
10.0 |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| Metro Area |
Rank |
Score |
| Atlanta |
32 |
9.7 |
| Austin |
2 |
11.8 |
| Boston |
3 |
11.3 |
| Buffalo |
4 |
11.2 |
| Charlotte |
48 |
9.3 |
| Chicago |
25 |
9.9 |
| Cincinnati |
21 |
10.0 |
| Cleveland |
24 |
9.9 |
| Columbus |
7 |
10.8 |
| Dallas |
44 |
9.3 |
| Dayton |
5 |
11.1 |
| Denver |
12 |
10.5 |
| Detroit |
14 |
10.3 |
| Grand Rapids |
43 |
9.3 |
| Greensboro |
28 |
9.8 |
| Hartford |
9 |
10.6 |
| Houston |
47 |
9.3 |
| Indianapolis |
37 |
9.6 |
| Jacksonville |
49 |
9.0 |
| Kansas City |
45 |
9.3 |
| Las Vegas |
50 |
8.7 |
| Los Angeles |
30 |
9.7 |
| Louisville |
42 |
9.4 |
| Memphis |
46 |
9.3 |
| Miami |
40 |
9.5 |
| Milwaukee |
34 |
9.6 |
| Minneapolis |
27 |
9.8 |
| Nashville |
23 |
9.9 |
| New Orleans |
17 |
10.2 |
| New York |
20 |
10.1 |
| Norfolk |
18 |
10.2 |
| Oklahoma City |
13 |
10.4 |
| Orlando |
39 |
9.5 |
| Philadelphia |
16 |
10.2 |
| Phoenix |
38 |
9.5 |
| Pittsburgh |
8 |
10.7 |
| Portland |
36 |
9.6 |
| Raleigh-Durham |
1 |
12.9 |
| Richmond |
26 |
9.8 |
| Rochester |
6 |
11.1 |
| Sacramento |
10 |
10.5 |
| Salt Lake City |
22 |
10.0 |
| San Antonio |
35 |
9.6 |
| San Diego |
19 |
10.2 |
| San Francisco |
29 |
9.7 |
| Seattle |
31 |
9.7 |
| St. Louis |
15 |
10.3 |
| Tampa |
33 |
9.6 |
| Washington |
11 |
10.5 |
| West Palm Beach |
41 |
9.4 |
|
Go
to next indicator >>
Metro Index Home | Introduction
| Overview &
Methodology | The Rankings |
Summary of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Metro Areas | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive
Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|