|

NewEconomy
Index.org Home
Metro Index Home
Introduction
Overview &
Methodology
The Rankings
Summary of Results
THE
INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus
of Manufacturing
PART III: ECONOMIC
DYNAMISM
"Gazelle"
Jobs

Job Churning

New Publicly
Traded Companies
PART IV: THE DIGITAL
ECONOMY
Online Population

Broadband Telecommunications
Capacity

Computer Use
in Schools

Commercial Internet
Domain Names

Internet
Backbone
PART V: INNOVATION
CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Degrees Granted
in Science and Engineering

Patents

Academic Research
and Development Funding

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGIES
Data Sources
The Metropolitan
Areas and their Major Cities
Weighting Methodology
Endnotes
The Authors

|
 |
High-Tech Jobs
Jobs in electronics and high-tech electronics manufacturing, software
and computer-related services, telecommunications, data processing and
information services, biomedical and electromedical services as a share
of total employment.
Why Is
This Important?
While high-tech industries make up less than 8 percent of the overall
economy's output, they are key drivers of the New Economy. Just as capital-
and machinery-intensive industries (autos, chemicals, and steel) drove
growth in the 1950s and '60s, high-tech firms are the growth engines of
the New Economy. And high-tech is concentrated in the nation's metro areas:
While the largest 114 metro areas account for 67 percent of all jobs,
they account for 81 percent of high-tech employment.
The Rankings:
The high-tech focus of metropolitan areas varies significantly, from a
high of 9 percent of the workforce in Austin to 1 percent in Las Vegas.25
With the exception of Chicago and Minneapolis, the leaders tend to be
on the two coasts (Boston, Washington, D.C., Raleigh, Portland, San Francisco,
and San Diego) and in the Mountain and Southwest states (Denver, Dallas,
and Austin).26 And
these metros tend to specialize in different aspects of high-technology:
software and biotech in Boston; Internet, telecommunications, and biotech
in Washington, D.C.; telecommunications and biotech in Denver; semiconductors
in Phoenix and Portland; and a broad mix of technologies in Silicon Valley
and Los Angeles.

 |
 |
100th-76th
Percentile |
 |
 |
75th-51st
Percentile |
 |
 |
50th-26th
Percentile |
 |
 |
25th-1st
Percentile |
| METRO
AREAS BY RANK |
| Rank |
Metro Area |
Score |
| 1 |
Austin |
9.0% |
| 2 |
San Francisco |
8.6% |
| 3 |
Raleigh-Durham |
8.0% |
| 4 |
Boston |
7.1% |
| 5 |
Denver |
5.1% |
| 6 |
Dallas |
5.0% |
| 7 |
San Diego |
4.9% |
| 8 |
Washington |
4.8% |
| 9 |
Minneapolis |
4.7% |
| 10 |
Portland |
4.5% |
| 11 |
Sacramento |
4.5% |
| 12 |
Rochester |
4.2% |
| 13 |
Atlanta |
4.1% |
| 14 |
New York |
4.0% |
| 15 |
Chicago |
4.0% |
| 16 |
Salt Lake City |
4.0% |
| 17 |
Phoenix |
4.0% |
| 18 |
Kansas City |
3.8% |
| 19 |
Tampa |
3.6% |
| 20 |
Philadelphia |
3.5% |
| 21 |
Pittsburgh |
3.4% |
| 22 |
Los Angeles |
3.4% |
| 23 |
Seattle |
3.4% |
| 24 |
Hartford |
3.1% |
| 25 |
Orlando |
3.1% |
| 26 |
Columbus |
3.0% |
| 27 |
St. Louis |
3.0% |
| 28 |
San Antonio |
2.9% |
| 29 |
Charlotte |
2.8% |
| 30 |
Indianapolis |
2.7% |
| 31 |
Milwaukee |
2.7% |
| 32 |
Dayton |
2.7% |
| 33 |
Detroit |
2.7% |
| 34 |
Buffalo |
2.7% |
| 35 |
Oklahoma City |
2.6% |
| 36 |
Cleveland |
2.6% |
| 37 |
West Palm Beach |
2.6% |
| 38 |
Houston |
2.5% |
| 39 |
Richmond |
2.4% |
| 40 |
Cincinnati |
2.4% |
| 41 |
Miami |
2.4% |
| 42 |
Memphis |
2.3% |
| 43 |
Greensboro |
2.3% |
| 44 |
Jacksonville |
2.1% |
| 45 |
Nashville |
1.9% |
| 46 |
Norfolk |
1.9% |
| 47 |
Louisville |
1.9% |
| 48 |
Grand Rapids |
1.9% |
| 49 |
New Orleans |
1.2% |
| 50 |
Las Vegas |
1.1% |
|
U.S. Average |
3.1% |
|
Top 50 Metro Average |
4.0% |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| Metro Area |
Rank |
Score |
| Atlanta |
13 |
4.1% |
| Austin |
1 |
9.0% |
| Boston |
4 |
7.1% |
| Buffalo |
34 |
2.7% |
| Charlotte |
29 |
2.8% |
| Chicago |
15 |
4.0% |
| Cincinnati |
40 |
2.4% |
| Cleveland |
36 |
2.6% |
| Columbus |
26 |
3.0% |
| Dallas |
6 |
5.0% |
| Dayton |
32 |
2.7% |
| Denver |
5 |
5.1% |
| Detroit |
33 |
2.7% |
| Grand Rapids |
48 |
1.9% |
| Greensboro |
43 |
2.3% |
| Hartford |
24 |
3.1% |
| Houston |
38 |
2.5% |
| Indianapolis |
30 |
2.7% |
| Jacksonville |
44 |
2.1% |
| Kansas City |
18 |
3.8% |
| Las Vegas |
50 |
1.1% |
| Los Angeles |
22 |
3.4% |
| Louisville |
47 |
1.9% |
| Memphis |
42 |
2.3% |
| Miami |
41 |
2.4% |
| Milwaukee |
31 |
2.7% |
| Minneapolis |
9 |
4.7% |
| Nashville |
45 |
1.9% |
| New Orleans |
49 |
1.2% |
| New York |
14 |
4.0% |
| Norfolk |
46 |
1.9% |
| Oklahoma City |
35 |
2.6% |
| Orlando |
25 |
3.1% |
| Philadelphia |
20 |
3.5% |
| Phoenix |
17 |
4.0% |
| Pittsburgh |
21 |
3.4% |
| Portland |
10 |
4.5% |
| Raleigh-Durham |
3 |
8.0% |
| Richmond |
39 |
2.4% |
| Rochester |
12 |
4.2% |
| Sacramento |
11 |
4.5% |
| Salt Lake City |
16 |
4.0% |
| San Antonio |
28 |
2.9% |
| San Diego |
7 |
4.9% |
| San Francisco |
2 |
8.6% |
| Seattle |
23 |
3.4% |
| St. Louis |
27 |
3.0% |
| Tampa |
19 |
3.6% |
| Washington |
8 |
4.8% |
| West Palm Beach |
37 |
2.6% |
|
Go
to next indicator >>
Metro Index Home | Introduction
| Overview &
Methodology | The Rankings |
Summary of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Metro Areas | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive
Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|