PPI Technology Project
 
NewEconomy
Index.org Home

 
Metro Index Home
 
Introduction
 
Overview & Methodology
 
The Rankings
 
Summary of Results

THE INDICATORS

PART I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
 
Managerial, Professional, and Technical Jobs


Workforce Education
 
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
 
Export Focus of Manufacturing
 
PART III: ECONOMIC DYNAMISM
 
"Gazelle" Jobs

Job Churning

New Publicly Traded Companies
 
PART IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
 
Online Population

Broadband Telecommunications Capacity

Computer Use in Schools

Commercial Internet Domain Names


Internet Backbone
 
PART V: INNOVATION CAPACITY
 
High-Tech Jobs

Degrees Granted in Science and Engineering

Patents

Academic Research and Development Funding

Venture Capital
 
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
 
Data Sources

 
The Metropolitan Areas and their Major Cities
 
Weighting Methodology
 
Endnotes
 
The Authors

Click Here

BROWSE BY METRO AREA:
The Metropolitan New Economy Index
PART IV: THE DIGITAL ECONOMY

Internet Backbone

Total capacity of all Internet backbone links to other metropolitan areas as share of employment.

Why Is This Important? Internet backbone is the physical network (usually relying on fiber optic cable) that carries Internet traffic between different networks and is measured in megabits per second.21 It is true that, because data travel at the speed of light, any place connected to any of the backbone networks should be as accessible as any other place. In reality, however, congestion at network hubs and junctions makes places with high levels of capacity better positioned to be home to companies that distribute large amounts of data via the Internet. If the "pipes" are not big enough relative to the amount of data going through them, data transmission speeds will slow. This is not so much an issue for individuals, where their modem speed and the "last mile" of connections usually cause the bottleneck. However, it can be an issue for companies, especially companies that are hosting and transiting large amounts of data. As a result, having a high capacity of Internet backbone in a metropolitan area relative to demand is a competitive advantage.

The Rankings: Backbone capacity has gradually diffused throughout the nation. In 1997, over 60 percent of backbone capacity originated in seven metropolitan areas (e.g., New York, Washington, D.C., Chicago). But by 1999, the same seven accounted for only 41 percent.22 Places with the most backbone capacity relative to demand tend to be located in the middle of the nation. Some metros that score high (e.g., Salt Lake City, St. Louis) may be stops on the "information highway" as backbone links cross the nation. Still others, such as Kansas City, Dallas, and Denver, score high because they are home to companies that are backbone providers. Nevertheless, all these places have high levels of capacity relative to demand.

Internet Backbone
100th-76th Percentile
75th-51st Percentile
50th-26th Percentile
25th-1st Percentile
 
METRO AREAS BY RANK
Rank Metro Area Score
1 Salt Lake City 103
2 Kansas City 78
3 Atlanta 59
4 Denver 57
5 Dallas 57
6 Las Vegas 52
7 Portland 51
8 Seattle 49
9 Orlando 46
10 San Francisco 45
11 Richmond 44
12 St. Louis 44
13 Washington 43
14 Austin 43
15 New Orleans 43
16 Sacramento 42
17 Chicago 41
18 Indianapolis 39
19 Charlotte 38
20 Jacksonville 36
21 Cleveland 35
22 Houston 30
23 Oklahoma City 28
24 Buffalo 27
25 San Diego 26
26 Phoenix 26
27 Hartford 25
28 Rochester 25
29 Milwaukee 24
30 Tampa 23
31 Greensboro 22
32 Philadelphia 21
33 Miami 21
34 Nashville 21
35 New York 21
36 Raleigh-Durham 20
37 Boston 20
38 Norfolk 20
39 Pittsburgh 19
40 San Antonio 18
41 Detroit 18
42 Memphis 17
43 Los Angeles 16
44 Minneapolis 15
45 Dayton 11
46 West Palm Beach 10
47 Cincinnati 7
48 Columbus 7
49 Louisville 2
50 Grand Rapids 0.5
U.S. Average NA
Top 50 Metro Average 31
    
ALPHABETICALLY
Metro Area Rank Score
Atlanta 3 59
Austin 14 43
Boston 37 20
Buffalo 24 27
Charlotte 19 38
Chicago 17 41
Cincinnati 47 7
Cleveland 21 35
Columbus 48 7
Dallas 5 57
Dayton 45 11
Denver 4 57
Detroit 41 18
Grand Rapids 50 0.5
Greensboro 31 22
Hartford 27 25
Houston 22 30
Indianapolis 18 39
Jacksonville 20 36
Kansas City 2 78
Las Vegas 6 52
Los Angeles 43 16
Louisville 49 2
Memphis 42 17
Miami 33 21
Milwaukee 29 24
Minneapolis 44 15
Nashville 34 21
New Orleans 15 43
New York 35 21
Norfolk 38 20
Oklahoma City 23 28
Orlando 9 46
Philadelphia 32 21
Phoenix 26 26
Pittsburgh 39 19
Portland 7 51
Raleigh-Durham 36 20
Richmond 11 44
Rochester 28 25
Sacramento 16 42
Salt Lake City 1 103
San Antonio 40 18
San Diego 25 26
San Francisco 10 45
Seattle 8 49
St. Louis 12 44
Tampa 30 23
Washington 13 43
West Palm Beach 46 10

Go to next indicator >>

 


 
Metro Index Home | Introduction | Overview &
Methodology
| The Rankings | Summary of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Metro Areas | Endnotes | The Authors

pdf Download PDF Version of This Report (3.1MB)
Please expect lengthy download time,
during which your browser window may appear blank.
(PDF version requires Acrobat Reader)
 
The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
 
 
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.