|

NewEconomy
Index.org Home
Metro Index Home
Introduction
Overview &
Methodology
The Rankings
Summary of Results
THE
INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus
of Manufacturing
PART III: ECONOMIC
DYNAMISM
"Gazelle"
Jobs

Job Churning

New Publicly
Traded Companies
PART IV: THE DIGITAL
ECONOMY
Online Population

Broadband Telecommunications
Capacity

Computer Use
in Schools

Commercial Internet
Domain Names

Internet
Backbone
PART V: INNOVATION
CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Degrees Granted
in Science and Engineering

Patents

Academic Research
and Development Funding

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGIES
Data Sources
The Metropolitan
Areas and their Major Cities
Weighting Methodology
Endnotes
The Authors

|
 |
Computer Use in Schools
The percentage of children using computers in the classroom.
Why Is
This Important? While the jury is still out on exactly how best to
integrate technology into the classroom, many believe computers and the
Internet can play a key role in improving education. And while this indicator
may not reflect outcomes in the short run, it may in the long run help
boost education levels. In the meantime, the use of information technology
in America's schools is growing. The percentage of schools with at least
one Internet connection has increased rapidly, from 35 percent in 1994
to over 95 percent in 1999. The percentage of classrooms with Internet
access has gone from 3 percent in 1994 to 63 percent in 1999.18
The Rankings:
Somewhat surprisingly, the metro areas where kids are most likely
to use computers in school appear to be older, industrial metros in the
Midwest. In contrast, some "high-tech" metros, such as San Francisco,
Seattle, Boston, and Salt Lake City, score much lower. It's possible that
political leaders in the former metros may more clearly recognize that
the IT revolution is an important key to their future prosperity and that
it is essential to properly train the next generation of workers.

 |
 |
100th-76th
Percentile |
 |
 |
75th-51st
Percentile |
 |
 |
50th-26th
Percentile |
 |
 |
25th-1st
Percentile |
| METRO
AREAS BY RANK |
| Rank |
Metro Area |
Score |
| 1 |
Louisville |
81% |
| 2 |
St. Louis |
80% |
| 3 |
Pittsburgh |
79% |
| 4 |
Milwaukee |
79% |
| 5 |
Rochester |
79% |
| 6 |
Charlotte |
77% |
| 7 |
Indianapolis |
77% |
| 8 |
Austin |
76% |
| 9 |
Minneapolis |
76% |
| 10 |
Cleveland |
75% |
| 11 |
Kansas City |
75% |
| 12 |
San Diego |
74% |
| 13 |
Dallas |
74% |
| 14 |
Washington |
74% |
| 15 |
Cincinnati |
72% |
| 16 |
Orlando |
72% |
| 17 |
Detroit |
72% |
| 18 |
Memphis |
71% |
| 19 |
Columbus |
70% |
| 20 |
Dayton |
70% |
| 21 |
Atlanta |
69% |
| 22 |
Sacramento |
69% |
| 23 |
Miami |
68% |
| 24 |
Chicago |
68% |
| 25 |
Raleigh-Durham |
68% |
| 26 |
Buffalo |
68% |
| 27 |
San Francisco |
68% |
| 28 |
Oklahoma City |
67% |
| 29 |
Nashville |
67% |
| 30 |
Portland |
67% |
| 31 |
Philadelphia |
67% |
| 32 |
Hartford |
65% |
| 33 |
Boston |
65% |
| 34 |
Norfolk |
64% |
| 35 |
Denver |
64% |
| 36 |
Salt Lake City |
64% |
| 37 |
Houston |
63% |
| 38 |
San Antonio |
63% |
| 39 |
Greensboro |
63% |
| 40 |
Jacksonville |
63% |
| 41 |
New York |
63% |
| 42 |
Seattle |
62% |
| 43 |
New Orleans |
61% |
| 44 |
Richmond |
60% |
| 45 |
Phoenix |
60% |
| 46 |
Grand Rapids |
58% |
| 47 |
Los Angeles |
58% |
| 48 |
Las Vegas |
57% |
| 49 |
Tampa |
56% |
| 50 |
West Palm Beach |
49% |
|
U.S. Average |
63% |
|
Top 50 Metro Average |
67% |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| Metro Area |
Rank |
Score |
| Atlanta |
21 |
69% |
| Austin |
8 |
76% |
| Boston |
33 |
65% |
| Buffalo |
26 |
68% |
| Charlotte |
6 |
77% |
| Chicago |
24 |
68% |
| Cincinnati |
15 |
72% |
| Cleveland |
10 |
75% |
| Columbus |
19 |
70% |
| Dallas |
13 |
74% |
| Dayton |
20 |
70% |
| Denver |
35 |
64% |
| Detroit |
17 |
72% |
| Grand Rapids |
46 |
58% |
| Greensboro |
39 |
63% |
| Hartford |
32 |
65% |
| Houston |
37 |
63% |
| Indianapolis |
7 |
77% |
| Jacksonville |
40 |
63% |
| Kansas City |
11 |
75% |
| Las Vegas |
48 |
57% |
| Los Angeles |
47 |
58% |
| Louisville |
1 |
81% |
| Memphis |
18 |
71% |
| Miami |
23 |
68% |
| Milwaukee |
4 |
79% |
| Minneapolis |
9 |
76% |
| Nashville |
29 |
67% |
| New Orleans |
43 |
61% |
| New York |
41 |
63% |
| Norfolk |
34 |
64% |
| Oklahoma City |
28 |
67% |
| Orlando |
16 |
72% |
| Philadelphia |
31 |
67% |
| Phoenix |
45 |
60% |
| Pittsburgh |
3 |
79% |
| Portland |
30 |
67% |
| Raleigh-Durham |
25 |
68% |
| Richmond |
44 |
60% |
| Rochester |
5 |
79% |
| Sacramento |
22 |
69% |
| Salt Lake City |
36 |
64% |
| San Antonio |
38 |
63% |
| San Diego |
12 |
74% |
| San Francisco |
27 |
68% |
| Seattle |
42 |
62% |
| St. Louis |
2 |
80% |
| Tampa |
49 |
56% |
| Washington |
14 |
74% |
| West Palm Beach |
50 |
49% |
|
Go
to next indicator >>
Metro Index Home | Introduction
| Overview &
Methodology | The Rankings |
Summary of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Metro Areas | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive
Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|