|

NewEconomy
Index.org Home
Metro Index Home
Introduction
Overview &
Methodology
The Rankings
Summary of Results
THE
INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus
of Manufacturing
PART III: ECONOMIC
DYNAMISM
"Gazelle"
Jobs

Job Churning

New Publicly
Traded Companies
PART IV: THE DIGITAL
ECONOMY
Online Population

Broadband Telecommunications
Capacity

Computer Use
in Schools

Commercial Internet
Domain Names

Internet
Backbone
PART V: INNOVATION
CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Degrees Granted
in Science and Engineering

Patents

Academic Research
and Development Funding

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGIES
Data Sources
The Metropolitan
Areas and their Major Cities
Weighting Methodology
Endnotes
The Authors

|
 |
Broadband Telecommunications
Capacity
The number of broadband competitors per zip code area.
Why Is
This Important? The ability to transfer large amounts of data over
the Internet is largely determined by bandwidth - the carrying capacity
of the connections, or the "size of the pipes" - between the
sender and the receiver of the data. Greater bandwidth (broadband) allows
faster transmission of larger amounts of data, and also makes possible
the feature of having the Internet "always on" (not having to
log on every time to use it). In a networked world, bandwidth is a core
determinant of what is technologically feasible. For example, basic Internet
telephony services are already available, but for widespread use of real-time,
full-motion video and high-quality telephony over Internet Protocol (IP)
networks, homes will need high-bandwidth connections. The best way to
measure this is to count the number of homes and businesses that subscribe
to broadband services, either through cable services or digital subscriber
lines (DSL) over the telephone. However, such data are not available.
Instead, data are available on the number of broadband providers (cable,
DSL, and other) in each zip code in the metropolitan areas. While this
does not measure the number of homes with broadband services, it does
provide an indication of both the extent of the broadband market and the
extent of competition.
The Rankings:
While there is no clear pattern with regard to what type of metros have
more broadband providers, the metropolitan areas with the most broadband
providers are concentrated on the West Coast, particularly in California.
It's important to also note that all 50 metro areas have at least an average
of two broadband providers per zip code.

 |
 |
100th-76th
Percentile |
 |
 |
75th-51st
Percentile |
 |
 |
50th-26th
Percentile |
 |
 |
25th-1st
Percentile |
| METRO
AREAS BY RANK |
| Rank |
Metro Area |
Score |
| 1 |
San
Francisco |
4.61 |
| 2 |
Denver |
4.52 |
| 3 |
San Diego |
4.43 |
| 4 |
Phoenix |
4.33 |
| 5 |
Los Angeles |
4.27 |
| 6 |
Chicago |
3.94 |
| 7 |
Atlanta |
3.87 |
| 8 |
Austin |
3.72 |
| 9 |
Seattle |
3.62 |
| 10 |
Washington |
3.56 |
| 11 |
Houston |
3.51 |
| 12 |
Dallas |
3.49 |
| 13 |
Richmond |
3.38 |
| 14 |
Detroit |
3.34 |
| 15 |
Miami |
3.31 |
| 16 |
Nashville |
3.27 |
| 17 |
New York |
3.08 |
| 18 |
Boston |
2.99 |
| 19 |
Philadelphia |
2.98 |
| 20 |
Portland |
2.91 |
| 21 |
Minneapolis |
2.86 |
| 22 |
Norfolk |
2.84 |
| 23 |
Memphis |
2.83 |
| 24 |
Sacramento |
2.82 |
| 25 |
Las Vegas |
2.79 |
| 26 |
Cleveland |
2.78 |
| 27 |
Charlotte |
2.77 |
| 28 |
Indianapolis |
2.76 |
| 29 |
Orlando |
2.76 |
| 30 |
West Palm Beach |
2.62 |
| 31 |
Columbus |
2.61 |
| 32 |
Oklahoma City |
2.59 |
| 33 |
Pittsburgh |
2.56 |
| 34 |
Salt Lake City |
2.53 |
| 35 |
San Antonio |
2.52 |
| 36 |
Tampa |
2.49 |
| 37 |
Louisville |
2.39 |
| 38 |
Cincinnati |
2.27 |
| 39 |
Greensboro |
2.22 |
| 40 |
Jacksonville |
2.15 |
| 41 |
Raleigh-Durham |
2.11 |
| 42 |
Hartford |
2.11 |
| 43 |
Grand Rapids |
2.08 |
| 44 |
Dayton |
2.07 |
| 45 |
Buffalo |
2.07 |
| 46 |
St. Louis |
2.05 |
| 47 |
New Orleans |
2.03 |
| 48 |
Milwaukee |
2.02 |
| 49 |
Kansas City |
2.00 |
| 50 |
Rochester |
2.00 |
|
U.S. Average |
NA |
|
Top 50 Metro Average |
3.12 |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| Metro Area |
Rank |
Score |
| Atlanta |
7 |
3.87 |
| Austin |
8 |
3.72 |
| Boston |
18 |
2.99 |
| Buffalo |
45 |
2.07 |
| Charlotte |
27 |
2.77 |
| Chicago |
6 |
3.94 |
| Cincinnati |
38 |
2.27 |
| Cleveland |
26 |
2.78 |
| Columbus |
31 |
2.61 |
| Dallas |
12 |
3.49 |
| Dayton |
44 |
2.07 |
| Denver |
2 |
4.52 |
| Detroit |
14 |
3.34 |
| Grand Rapids |
43 |
2.08 |
| Greensboro |
39 |
2.22 |
| Hartford |
42 |
2.11 |
| Houston |
11 |
3.51 |
| Indianapolis |
28 |
2.76 |
| Jacksonville |
40 |
2.15 |
| Kansas City |
49 |
2.00 |
| Las Vegas |
25 |
2.79 |
| Los Angeles |
5 |
4.27 |
| Louisville |
37 |
2.39 |
| Memphis |
23 |
2.83 |
| Miami |
15 |
3.31 |
| Milwaukee |
48 |
2.02 |
| Minneapolis |
21 |
2.86 |
| Nashville |
16 |
3.27 |
| New Orleans |
47 |
2.03 |
| New York |
17 |
3.08 |
| Norfolk |
22 |
2.84 |
| Oklahoma City |
32 |
2.59 |
| Orlando |
29 |
2.76 |
| Philadelphia |
19 |
2.98 |
| Phoenix |
4 |
4.33 |
| Pittsburgh |
33 |
2.56 |
| Portland |
20 |
2.91 |
| Raleigh-Durham |
41 |
2.11 |
| Richmond |
13 |
3.38 |
| Rochester |
50 |
2.00 |
| Sacramento |
24 |
2.82 |
| Salt Lake City |
34 |
2.53 |
| San Antonio |
35 |
2.52 |
| San Diego |
3 |
4.43 |
| San Francisco |
1 |
4.61 |
| Seattle |
9 |
3.62 |
| St. Louis |
46 |
2.05 |
| Tampa |
36 |
2.49 |
| Washington |
10 |
3.56 |
| West Palm Beach |
30 |
2.62 |
|
Go
to next indicator >>
Metro Index Home | Introduction
| Overview &
Methodology | The Rankings |
Summary of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Metro Areas | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive
Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|