|

NewEconomy
Index.org Home
Metro Index Home
Introduction
Overview &
Methodology
The Rankings
Summary of Results
THE
INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus
of Manufacturing
PART III: ECONOMIC
DYNAMISM
"Gazelle"
Jobs

Job Churning

New Publicly
Traded Companies
PART IV: THE DIGITAL
ECONOMY
Online Population

Broadband Telecommunications
Capacity

Computer Use
in Schools

Commercial Internet
Domain Names

Internet
Backbone
PART V: INNOVATION
CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Degrees Granted
in Science and Engineering

Patents

Academic Research
and Development Funding

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGIES
Data Sources
The Metropolitan
Areas and their Major Cities
Weighting Methodology
Endnotes
The Authors

|
 |
New Publicly Traded Companies
The number of companies' initial public stock offerings as a share
of gross metropolitan product.
Why Is
This Important?
In the last two decades, financial markets have embraced entrepreneurial
dynamism. The number of initial public offerings (first rounds of companies'
stock sold when they make their debut in public markets) has risen by
50 percent between the 1960s and the 1990s. While the number of IPOs priced
and filed fell from 1,095 in 1999 to 489 in 2000, the number is still
quite high relative to earlier years. IPOs are important because they
indicate the degree to which an economy is producing companies that have
long-term and substantial growth potential.
The Rankings:
Most metropolitan areas that score well on the IPO indicator, such as
San Francisco and Seattle, do so because they are producing a large number
of start-ups with growth potential. West Palm Beach scores well, reflecting
its growing high-tech presence - the area is known as the Internet Coast.
Some areas that score high on other indicators, score low on IPOs (e.g.,
Raleigh, Washington, D.C., and Salt Lake City) suggesting that their economies
may not be as entrepreneurial as they could be.

 |
 |
100th-76th
Percentile |
 |
 |
75th-51st
Percentile |
 |
 |
50th-26th
Percentile |
 |
 |
25th-1st
Percentile |
| METRO
AREAS BY RANK |
| Rank |
Metro Area |
Score |
| 1 |
San Francisco |
32.3 |
| 2 |
Seattle |
28.1 |
| 3 |
West Palm Beach |
11.8 |
| 4 |
Boston |
10.0 |
| 5 |
Austin |
9.4 |
| 6 |
Denver |
7.5 |
| 7 |
San Diego |
6.9 |
| 8 |
Atlanta |
5.5 |
| 9 |
Oklahoma City |
5.1 |
| 10 |
New York |
4.5 |
| 11 |
Portland |
4.1 |
| 12 |
Philadelphia |
3.9 |
| 13 |
Miami |
3.8 |
| 14 |
Houston |
3.6 |
| 15 |
Minneapolis |
3.6 |
| 16 |
Chicago |
3.5 |
| 17 |
Washington |
3.5 |
| 18 |
Kansas City |
3.4 |
| 19 |
Dallas |
3.3 |
| 20 |
Phoenix |
3.0 |
| 21 |
Los Angeles |
2.7 |
| 22 |
Raleigh-Durham |
2.5 |
| 23 |
Nashville |
2.4 |
| 24 |
Cincinnati |
2.4 |
| 25 |
Rochester |
2.4 |
| 26 |
Salt Lake City |
2.4 |
| 27 |
Greensboro |
2.3 |
| 28 |
Las Vegas |
2.1 |
| 29 |
St. Louis |
1.8 |
| 30 |
Hartford |
1.7 |
| 31 |
Louisville |
1.4 |
| 32 |
Memphis |
1.4 |
| 33 |
Pittsburgh |
1.4 |
| 34 |
Tampa |
1.4 |
| 35 |
Indianapolis |
1.0 |
| 36 |
Charlotte |
0.9 |
| 37 |
Columbus |
0.9 |
| 38 |
Milwaukee |
0.9 |
| 39 |
Sacramento |
0.8 |
| 40 |
Detroit |
0.6 |
| 41 |
Cleveland |
0.5 |
| 42 |
Buffalo |
0.0 |
| 42 |
Dayton |
0.0 |
| 42 |
Grand Rapids |
0.0 |
| 42 |
Jacksonville |
0.0 |
| 42 |
New Orleans |
0.0 |
| 42 |
Norfolk |
0.0 |
| 42 |
Orlando |
0.0 |
| 42 |
Richmond |
0.0 |
| 42 |
San Antonio |
0.0 |
|
U.S. Average |
4.0 |
|
Top 50 Metro Average |
4.8 |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| Metro Area |
Rank |
Score |
| Atlanta |
8 |
5.5 |
| Austin |
5 |
9.4 |
| Boston |
4 |
10.0 |
| Buffalo |
42 |
0.0 |
| Charlotte |
36 |
0.9 |
| Chicago |
16 |
3.5 |
| Cincinnati |
24 |
2.4 |
| Cleveland |
41 |
0.5 |
| Columbus |
37 |
0.9 |
| Dallas |
19 |
3.3 |
| Dayton |
42 |
0.0 |
| Denver |
6 |
7.5 |
| Detroit |
40 |
0.6 |
| Grand Rapids |
42 |
0.0 |
| Greensboro |
27 |
2.3 |
| Hartford |
30 |
1.7 |
| Houston |
14 |
3.6 |
| Indianapolis |
35 |
1.0 |
| Jacksonville |
42 |
0.0 |
| Kansas City |
18 |
3.4 |
| Las Vegas |
28 |
2.1 |
| Los Angeles |
21 |
2.7 |
| Louisville |
31 |
1.4 |
| Memphis |
32 |
1.4 |
| Miami |
13 |
3.8 |
| Milwaukee |
38 |
0.9 |
| Minneapolis |
15 |
3.6 |
| Nashville |
23 |
2.4 |
| New Orleans |
42 |
0.0 |
| New York |
10 |
4.5 |
| Norfolk |
42 |
0.0 |
| Oklahoma City |
9 |
5.1 |
| Orlando |
42 |
0.0 |
| Philadelphia |
12 |
3.9 |
| Phoenix |
20 |
3.0 |
| Pittsburgh |
33 |
1.4 |
| Portland |
11 |
4.1 |
| Raleigh-Durham |
22 |
2.5 |
| Richmond |
42 |
0.0 |
| Rochester |
25 |
2.4 |
| Sacramento |
39 |
0.8 |
| Salt Lake City |
26 |
2.4 |
| San Antonio |
42 |
0.0 |
| San Diego |
7 |
6.9 |
| San Francisco |
1 |
32.3 |
| Seattle |
2 |
28.1 |
| St. Louis |
29 |
1.8 |
| Tampa |
34 |
1.4 |
| Washington |
17 |
3.5 |
| West Palm Beach |
3 |
11.8 |
|
Go
to next indicator >>
Metro Index Home | Introduction
| Overview &
Methodology | The Rankings |
Summary of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Metro Areas | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive
Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|