|

NewEconomy
Index.org Home
Metro Index Home
Introduction
Overview &
Methodology
The Rankings
Summary of Results
THE
INDICATORS
PART
I: KNOWLEDGE JOBS
Managerial,
Professional, and Technical Jobs

Workforce
Education
PART II: GLOBALIZATION
Export Focus
of Manufacturing
PART III: ECONOMIC
DYNAMISM
"Gazelle"
Jobs

Job Churning

New Publicly
Traded Companies
PART IV: THE DIGITAL
ECONOMY
Online Population

Broadband Telecommunications
Capacity

Computer Use
in Schools

Commercial Internet
Domain Names

Internet
Backbone
PART V: INNOVATION
CAPACITY
High-Tech Jobs

Degrees Granted
in Science and Engineering

Patents

Academic Research
and Development Funding

Venture Capital
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGIES
Data Sources
The Metropolitan
Areas and their Major Cities
Weighting Methodology
Endnotes
The Authors

|
 |
Managerial, Professional, and Technical
Jobs
Managers, professionals, and technicians as a share of the
total workforce.
Why Is
This Important? The rise of new industries has meant the rise of new
jobs, while new technology and new ways of organizing work have transformed
many existing jobs. Both trends have changed the occupational mix in America.
In particular, managerial, professional, and technical jobs have increased
as a share of total employment. These workers include, among others, managers,
engineers and scientists, health professionals, lawyers, educators, accountants,
bankers, consultants, and engineering technicians.
The Rankings:
Metro areas with high rankings tend to have a large number of corporate
or regional headquarters. For example, Hartford is home to insurance and
defense headquarters. But government helps as well. Washington, D.C.'s
large number of government jobs, combined with its many lawyers and growing
high-tech industry, accounts for its number one rank, while Hartford,
Austin, Minneapolis, Denver, Raleigh, Boston, and Salt Lake City are all
state capitols. Places that score low (e.g., Las Vegas, Memphis, San Antonio,
all the Florida metros) tend to be in the South and Southwest, and are
places that have historically focused on a low-cost industrial recruitment
model, emphasizing low costs over quality of life and an infrastructure
for innovation.6

 |
 |
100th-76th
Percentile |
 |
 |
75th-51st
Percentile |
 |
 |
50th-26th
Percentile |
 |
 |
25th-1st
Percentile |
| METRO
AREAS BY RANK |
| Rank |
Metro Area |
Score |
| 1 |
Washington |
48% |
| 2 |
Hartford |
46% |
| 3 |
Austin |
46% |
| 4 |
Minneapolis |
45% |
| 5 |
Denver |
45% |
| 6 |
Raleigh-Durham |
44% |
| 7 |
Seattle |
44% |
| 8 |
Boston |
43% |
| 9 |
Nashville |
41% |
| 10 |
Salt Lake City |
41% |
| 11 |
San Diego |
40% |
| 12 |
Atlanta |
40% |
| 13 |
Philadelphia |
40% |
| 14 |
San Francisco |
40% |
| 15 |
Indianapolis |
39% |
| 16 |
Cincinnati |
39% |
| 17 |
Cleveland |
39% |
| 18 |
Dallas |
38% |
| 19 |
Columbus |
38% |
| 20 |
Oklahoma City |
38% |
| 21 |
Kansas City |
37% |
| 22 |
Dayton |
37% |
| 23 |
Detroit |
37% |
| 24 |
Buffalo |
37% |
| 25 |
New York |
37% |
| 26 |
Milwaukee |
37% |
| 27 |
New Orleans |
37% |
| 28 |
Portland |
36% |
| 29 |
Chicago |
36% |
| 30 |
Pittsburgh |
36% |
| 31 |
Rochester |
36% |
| 32 |
Charlotte |
35% |
| 33 |
Norfolk |
35% |
| 34 |
Phoenix |
34% |
| 35 |
Richmond |
33% |
| 36 |
Grand Rapids |
33% |
| 37 |
St. Louis |
33% |
| 38 |
Tampa |
32% |
| 39 |
Louisville |
32% |
| 40 |
Sacramento |
32% |
| 41 |
Orlando |
31% |
| 42 |
Los Angeles |
31% |
| 43 |
West Palm Beach |
31% |
| 44 |
Houston |
31% |
| 45 |
Greensboro |
31% |
| 46 |
San Antonio |
30% |
| 47 |
Miami |
30% |
| 48 |
Jacksonville |
27% |
| 49 |
Memphis |
26% |
| 50 |
Las Vegas |
25% |
|
U.S. Average |
36.0% |
|
Top 50 Metro Average |
37.3% |
|
|
| ALPHABETICALLY |
| Metro Area |
Rank |
Score |
| Atlanta |
12 |
40% |
| Austin |
3 |
46% |
| Boston |
8 |
43% |
| Buffalo |
24 |
37% |
| Charlotte |
32 |
35% |
| Chicago |
29 |
36% |
| Cincinnati |
16 |
39% |
| Cleveland |
17 |
39% |
| Columbus |
19 |
38% |
| Dallas |
18 |
38% |
| Dayton |
22 |
37% |
| Denver |
5 |
45% |
| Detroit |
23 |
37% |
| Grand Rapids |
36 |
33% |
| Greensboro |
45 |
31% |
| Hartford |
2 |
46% |
| Houston |
44 |
31% |
| Indianapolis |
15 |
39% |
| Jacksonville |
48 |
27% |
| Kansas City |
21 |
37% |
| Las Vegas |
50 |
25% |
| Los Angeles |
42 |
31% |
| Louisville |
39 |
32% |
| Memphis |
49 |
26% |
| Miami |
47 |
30% |
| Milwaukee |
26 |
37% |
| Minneapolis |
4 |
45% |
| Nashville |
9 |
41% |
| New Orleans |
27 |
37% |
| New York |
25 |
37% |
| Norfolk |
33 |
35% |
| Oklahoma City |
20 |
38% |
| Orlando |
41 |
31% |
| Philadelphia |
13 |
40% |
| Phoenix |
34 |
34% |
| Pittsburgh |
30 |
36% |
| Portland |
28 |
36% |
| Raleigh-Durham |
6 |
44% |
| Richmond |
35 |
33% |
| Rochester |
31 |
36% |
| Sacramento |
40 |
32% |
| Salt Lake City |
10 |
41% |
| San Antonio |
46 |
30% |
| San Diego |
11 |
40% |
| San Francisco |
14 |
40% |
| Seattle |
7 |
44% |
| St. Louis |
37 |
33% |
| Tampa |
38 |
32% |
| Washington |
1 |
48% |
| West Palm Beach |
43 |
31% |
|
Go
to next indicator >>
Metro Index Home | Introduction
| Overview &
Methodology | The Rankings |
Summary of Results
Development Strategies | Data Sources
Metro Areas | Endnotes
| The Authors
The Progressive
Policy Institute (PPI)
Technology, Innovation, and New Economy Project
600 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 400, Washington DC 20003
Phone: (202) 547-0001
www.ppionline.org
Website design by OnlineWorkshop.
|